House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was military.

Last in Parliament October 2015, as NDP MP for Sackville—Eastern Shore (Nova Scotia)

Lost his last election, in 2015, with 34% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Division No. 245 October 22nd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to question the government's ability and ingenuity on the post-TAGS adjustment program, the one that was recently announced.

This may sound different but I have to give credit to the government for at least having some form of initiative in a post-TAGS adjustment program when all the indications out there were that it would not do anything at all.

The unfortunate part is that the new program falls extremely short of assisting those people who have been seriously affected by the downturn of the fishery as well as DFO government policies. There is no question at all that when the new TAGS adjustment program was announced, thousands and thousands of the fishermen and plant workers on the east coast of Atlantic Canada and in Quebec were shut out of the new system.

Basically what they have done is apply one set of fishing groups against another. During committee consideration in early May and June I begged the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to announce the program while the House was in session so that we could debate the issue here and not through the media.

He had said at that time that he would take it under consideration but could not offer any guarantees. Unfortunately that wish went by the boards, and they announced the program in Newfoundland which unfortunately turned into a bit of a shouting match between displaced fishers and representatives of the government who were there to announce the program.

The real essence of this entire equation is that fishermen and plant workers do not want the damn TAGS. They do not want it. They just want to work.

A classic example is that today I announced in a statement in the House that the town of Canso which was a viable fishing community with over 400 years of self-sufficiency will now announce at the beginning of January that it will have to claim civic bankruptcy because of the direct policies of DFO.

The fact of the matter is that a lot of fishermen and plant workers throughout the Atlantic coast and Quebec were shut out of any adjustment program. Another aspect to the adjustment program is the licence buyback. It falls extremely far short and is absolutely criminal of what the government has done to these people who invested their entire lives in historical attachment to the fishery to get crumbs from this federal government.

In conclusion we do not have an agreement with the United States on Pacific salmon because the minister himself said “the United States is a very powerful nation and we have to tread carefully in negotiations with them”.

I have on my desk the fact that the very mighty and powerful nation of the Faroe Islands has convinced Canada that we have to open up the Flemish Cap which is just outside the 200 mile limit. We have to give it additional access to shrimp. This shrimp allocation should have gone to those Canadians in Canso and in Mulgrave. Unfortunately now hundreds of people will be losing their jobs because we capitulated to that great powerful nation, the Faroe Islands.

It is absolutely scandalous that thousands of Canadians in this country can be so seriously let down by this government.

Foreign Publishers Advertising Services Act October 22nd, 1998

Madam Speaker, the hon. member indicated how many bright Canadians have gone down to the United States.

As he knows, recently it has been reported in Canada for I believe the fifth year running that we are the number one country in the world in which to live. I wonder if he has any statistical information on how many Americans may have come up to Canada in terms of their best and brightest.

Fisheries October 22nd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, after 400 years of self-sufficiency the town of Canso, Nova Scotia, will have to proclaim civic bankruptcy early in the new year. This is a direct result of the policy of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to privatize the fishery. It is a classic example of how the policies of the government can devastate the economy of a small coastal community.

In the town of Mulgrave, Nova Scotia, a processing plant is moving to Newfoundland because DFO will not allow the company to access the northern shrimp allocation. At the same time the Liberal government gives away shrimp to foreign nations, shrimp that could be used to save over 100 jobs in Mulgrave. This is an absolute disgrace.

The government is forcing Canadians on to welfare when all they have ever done and all they want to do is to work and become active members of society. The government and the people who run DFO should be absolutely ashamed of themselves.

Supply October 20th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to hear the member talk about justice and democracy while we know full well that his entire party has been whipped into opposing this motion tonight. If he believes in democracy, why do the Liberals not hold a free vote on the issue and allow the individual members of the Liberal government to decide their fate?

The member talked about the RCMP and what a great job they are doing. Yes, the RCMP do a wonderful job in this country. At the same time, the Liberal government cuts funding to the RCMP, shuts down the base in Regina for a period of time and continually harasses police officers across the country with cutbacks to their services, making their job more and more difficult.

The real problem in what the students did was that they did not fight back. If the students had pepper sprayed the police, they would have been charged before a court of law and their legal fees would have been handled by the courts. They would have been handled by the government of the day. Is he suggesting that in the future if students are going to have peaceful protests, they should resort to violence in order to have their legal fees covered?

Supply October 20th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I thank the Progressive Conservative Party for its support on the NDP's opposition motion today. I have just one simple question for the member.

Two questions were asked to the solicitor general earlier in our debating back and forth about whether in his opinion the $650,000 which was recently allocated to the commission could go toward funding the legal assistance for those students. I would just like to get the member's opinion about this.

Canadian Coast Guard October 19th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the merger of the coast guard and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans has been absolutely disastrous.

In the past several years tens of millions of dollars have been cut from the Canadian Coast Guard, severely limiting Canada's search and rescue capabilities. By next April a further $55 million will be cut from the coast guard.

After the Swissair disaster the men and women of the coast guard did yeomen's work. Their competence in extremely difficult circumstances made all Canadians extremely proud and demonstrated why the coast guard requires adequate funding.

Now these brave men and women are getting pink slips and tied up ships. With a coastline as long as Canada's, this is scandalous. The coast guard will not be able to do its job without the proper tools and adequate resources.

What does the government plan to do next, contract our search and rescue requirements to the United States?

Competition Act October 9th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I beg the indulgence of the House. I forgot to wish my mom and dad who are watching a very happy Thanksgiving.

Competition Act October 9th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, it would be a very rare day that I would agree with anyone on the government side. However, today, on behalf of my party, I plan to definitely do that.

First I want to speak about my colleague, the hon. member for Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, whose riding is in the beautiful province of Saskatchewan. He has made tremendous efforts throughout his entire political and business career trying to get the gas and oil companies and governments to listen not only to his concerns and those of his constituents, but also to the concerns of Canadians right across the country.

I want to send the hon. member who is presenting this bill today kudos. Although it may not be strong enough, it is a step in the right direction and we compliment him on that.

I will speak as a consumer. I have always believed that the gas companies get away with far too much. They are much too friendly with the government of the day.

My colleague from the Reform Party says that they can look after themselves. Today in Toronto gas prices went up 8 cents per litre, just before the Thanksgiving holiday long weekend. That is an absolute outrage.

There are two people in my riding who have done an exceptional job in trying to focus this issue on the gas companies and protection not only for consumers but for jobs and independent retailers. They are Mr. David Collins, the vice-president of Wilson Fuels, and Mr. John Holm, the MLA for Sackville, which happens to be in my riding of Sackville—Eastern Shore. These two individuals have fought very hard.

I wish to read from a letter that Mr. Collins wrote to my hon. colleague from Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre.

Bill C-235 aims to amend the Competition Act so that all market participants treat Retailers in a fair and equitable way, and ensures that wholesalers of fuel (both Refiners and Marketers who wholesale) market their fuel in a non-discriminatory fashion. Furthermore, Bill C-235 will go a long way towards breaking the oligopolistic practices of the major oil companies, and their efforts at market control through the widespread use of “Zone Pricing”.

The practice of “Zone Pricing” is frequently used to target Independent Marketers by offering certain outlets who are in close contact to Independents preferential pricing. The impact of this preferential pricing technique is to discipline smaller players into price conformance. This is why prices in Canada are routinely uniform through a region.

It is important to note that this is not the case in the United States. The reason for that is simple—the U.S. has many rules, which serve to encourage competition, and hence through the practice of increased competition—a wider choice and lower prices benefit customers. Manju Sekhri will be forwarding copies of the U.S. legislation, which applies to gasoline Marketing in the U.S., and as a comparison what we have in Canada.

We will all be startled by the disparity which exists between ourselves and our free trade partners. This important element between our two countries was left out of the free trade agreement.

I wish to get a little closer to my own riding and deal with the Ultramar plant. In 1990 Ultramar took over the Texaco plant, in the home of Eastern Passage—Cow Bay, with the assistance of provincial and government financing of $50 million. The object of that $50 million was to protect jobs and create competition in the market.

Unfortunately, the deal was for seven years. Ultramar decided in 1994 to leave town halfway through its commitment to that loan. One hundred and sixty extremely well paying jobs were devastated and gone. There was less competition within the area and not once did the provincial or the current government ask Ultramar for any of that money back. It was gone.

To throw salt into the injury, the Economic Development Corporation, which this government tends to lean on quite heavily, insulted workers and families in Nova Scotia. an oil company in the United Arab Emirates came with cap in hand to Canada saying they would like to pick off the finer parts of the refinery and shift it over to their country to create their own employment. That is an extremely wealthy nation. They could have reached into their pockets and paid for it themselves.

What did we do? We gave them $25 million of our tax dollars to dismantle the plant as well as two other refineries in British Columbia to create employment in that country. We continuously destroy jobs in this country. I am ashamed.

As part of the 1990 takeover of Texaco by Ultramar, Ultramar undertook the competition directorate to continue operating an oil refinery in Eastern Passage, Nova Scotia for seven years. In 1993 Ultramar further agreed that if it ceased operations it would give the director evidence of efforts to publicly sell the refinery.

In 1994 Ultramar gave notice of its intention to close the refinery. They did not even look for a competent buyer to buy the plant, even though we have record after record showing that there were enough buyers out there to buy the entire plant, the wharves and the docks. Ultramar refused with provincial and federal capitulation. It is absolutely scandalous that this continues. I should also say on behalf of my colleague from Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre that if Bill C-235 does not fulfil all the aspirations of what we are looking for and what consumers are looking for, my hon. colleague also has a bill on the order paper, Bill C-384, an act respecting the energy price commission.

The bill would establish a commission to regulate the wholesale and retail price of gasoline, taking into account both the public interest in having reasonable and consistent prices and the need for manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers to have reasonable costs covered. The commission could also conduct hearings on competition in the oil industry referred to it by the competition tribunal.

In Canada we accept that some prices of goods and services which are central to the economy and often controlled by monopolies or near monopolies ought to be regulated in the public interest. That is true for telephone rates, cable TV and other prices.

I certainly cannot let something like competition go without mentioning the bank mergers. I am hoping that if we cannot get it through on the opposition side a member of the government side will bring in a private member's bill to stop and halt the bank mergers because that also would destroy competition in this country.

Independent gas retailers are small business people who promote competition and keep prices down. But they are vulnerable to the pricing practices of major oil companies. It is absolutely scandalous that this would continue.

Last summer there was a gasoline price war in the city of Moncton where things almost came to blows because gasoline was so low. All it did was be destructive. Although the consumers enjoyed it for a while in the end it was more harmful than it was good.

On behalf of Mike Williams, the head of the Atlantic Oil Workers Union of Nova Scotia, and his 160 workers who have worked so diligently to try to get a bill like this passed, I want to say to the member presenting this bill he has the full co-operation of this union and he has the full co-operation of our party in putting this bill forward.

Mr. Speaker, I wish you and your family, all members and those people in the gallery a very happy Thanksgiving.

Committees Of The House October 9th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, as the member for Vancouver Island North and the Reform member indicated, there is serious trouble happening within DFO and its management.

As they are aware, we have had 16 ministers in the last seven years and most of them have used that portfolio as a revolving door to move somewhere else. They do all the damage they can do and then they try to destroy another department.

Given what is going on now with the fisheries crisis on all three coasts and in our inland waters, does he not think it is a good idea that the current Minister of Fisheries and Oceans resign?

Programs For Young People October 8th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I am very proud, on behalf of my hon. colleague for Halifax West, to speak on behalf of the 223 Volvo workers and their families in Nova Scotia.

The other day in this House the Minister of Industry said the closure of the Volvo plant has nothing to do with Bill C-11, the auto tariff reduction bill, and that the plant is not moving to Mexico. Obviously a memory lapse seems to have happened on the cabinet side.

I want to quote some editorial sections. They are very true. The company plans to assemble S70 and V70 model automobiles, the same automobiles currently built in Halifax, at a plant at its bus division that it recently purchased for $70 million in the U.S. and Mexico. There is a sense from everybody in Nova Scotia, especially those workers and families, that Ottawa played a key role in sacrificing the Halifax plant's future when it decided in the last round of world trade talks to lower auto tariffs from 18% down to just over 6%.

In the past, the Halifax small plant was valuable to Volvo because it gave the firm the right to import cars to Canada under duty free under the auto pact. Yet Ottawa made no contingency plans for the possible impact of a tariff reduction on a major employer here. All we ask is that someone go down there and assist those workers in that regard.

Volvo states the Halifax plant is too small for the 8,000 car units it builds every year, yet it wants to start up a 1,000 car operation in Mexico. It does not make any sense, but that is what it is doing.

Volvo states that it is going to build buses in Mexico. It just purchased a bus plant. I ask Volvo and I ask the minister what does that do to Prevost Car Inc. and Novabus in Quebec? What happens to the 1,400 workers in Quebec?

Volvo plant workers are very disappointed with the federal and provincial government response to their crisis. Right now the CAW union along with members of the board of commerce and whoever else will go are planning a trip to Sweden to try to get Volvo to change its mind and do something for the workers.

As all Canadians know, after the recent Swissair fatal crash off the coast of Peggy's Cove in Nova Scotia, the world got to know exactly what Nova Scotians are made of. We are compassionate. We are caring. We are giving. We are salt of the earth people, as all Atlantic Canadians are. Why would a profitable company not want to stay here and utilize that valuable workforce to meet its needs?

The workers and I are very disappointed with a memo I received from sources within Volvo about the severance package given to these workers. It says anybody who criticises this measly severance will be terminated from the severance package. They will have no access at all. What kind of a democracy do we live in?

Mr. Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity to speak on behalf of the 223 great, hardworking workers of Nova Scotia and their families. I only wish that this government would think before it enacts laws that destroy the jobs and the economy of Nova Scotians.