Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 166-180 of 277
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  It would be, for example, when you go to the Ottawa airport and Americans are here on Canadian soil pre-clearing you to enter into the United States. That's a pre-clearance officer.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  It depends on whether they meet all the conditions under the Preclearance Act.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  Just for clarification, it's not all banks. It's the Bank of Canada.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  The same Criminal Code wording is retained, as currently written, to which we simply add “firearm parts”.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  You’re correct. It’s an error. The translation is missing.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  It’s a drafting issue. We would only change the English version, not the French version in this case. You’re making me work hard today. As far as the passage you’re talking about, it’s a matter of writing style, which is a little different in the English and French versions. The phrase “firearm parts” is in the wording of subsection (4) itself.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  It is G-42.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  There are several amendments throughout the package that refer to firearm parts. Some are consequential in the Criminal Code and others are with regard to requiring a licence to acquire and import a firearm part. The one on licensing is G-42.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  No. G-20 is for the Criminal Code and it would allow a judge to issue an order, when there are reasonable grounds to believe there's a public safety risk, to forfeit the firearm part, and to issue a weapons prohibition order against the person from whom it was being seized for up to five years.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  I'll let my colleagues from Justice talk with regard to the Criminal Code. There are several packages of measures with regard to ghost guns. With regard to licensing and requiring a licence to acquire or import, that's in the Firearms Act. There are others for defining illegally manufactured firearms as prohibited firearms.

May 10th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  I believe a motion on Tuesday was for all barrels and handgun slides, as well as prescribed parts, so it is limited to those pieces.

May 4th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  Thank you for the question. We would have to undertake an in-depth analysis to determine what the framework is, what political will exists and what activities should be regulated.

May 4th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  Everything is doable when the political will is there.

May 4th, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale

Public Safety committee  The new definition that is being proposed is one that's based on technical characteristics that the government has determined—or made a decision proposal—are not suitable for civilian use and pose a risk to public safety.

May 2nd, 2023Committee meeting

Rachel Mainville-Dale