Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 92941-92955 of 141614
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  I do not know at this point in time if there are any new novel arguments or new novel points to be made. It is in circumstances like this where there is a clear intention to delay and obstruct a bill like this that a motion like this—

April 16th, 2010House debate

Peter Van LoanConservative

International Trade committee  One that I quite agree with was when he said it is the private sector that pays for the public sector. I thought that was very clear, and I think he was quite correct. He also mentioned, and you clarified, the number of deaths of trade unionists per 100,000 people. I think you made that very clear, and I appreciate your clarifying that for all of our purposes.

December 3rd, 2009Committee meeting

Ed HolderConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, our government's position is clear: we will not reopen the abortion debate.

April 16th, 2010House debate

Daniel PetitConservative

Fairness at the Pumps Act  Only the Liberals would refer to the fact that Canadian consumers are losing millions and millions of dollars because of inaccurate pumps as a phantom issue. Let us be very clear on the distinction between our two parties. The centrepiece of the last Liberal election campaign was a carbon tax that would have significantly increased gas prices. Over the past year the Liberal leader proposed raising a broad range of taxes, from sales taxes to corporate taxes.

April 16th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Afghanistan  He said that Colonel Yassin said that NDS would not accept a sick detainee and that when the Canadians insisted, Colonel Yassin removed his pistol, put it on the table, and said, ‘Here is my gun. Go shoot him. Give me the body and I will justify it for you”. Their intentions were clear and yet the detainee was still transferred. No more excuses. The need for a public inquiry is obvious to everyone, seemingly, except for the government. Why will it not call a public inquiry?

April 16th, 2010House debate

Paul DewarNDP

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, let me very clear to the member for Vancouver East. When the allegations were brought forward to the Prime Minister, he referred the matter to the competent authorities. He is not in a position to say whether they are true or untrue.

April 16th, 2010House debate

John BairdConservative

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, let us be very clear. There are allegations against a member of Parliament who is no longer a member of the ministry. If the member opposite has evidence that anything that has happened is inappropriate, I would encourage her to do the right thing, to follow the example of the Prime Minister, and forward any allegations or any information she has to the relevant authorities so that they can do the right thing.

April 16th, 2010House debate

John BairdConservative

Ethics  Let us be very clear, Mr. Speaker. No funding was recommended and no funding was given with respect to this project. The government acted ethically, properly and expeditiously. When these concerns were raised with the Prime Minister, he did the right thing.

April 16th, 2010House debate

John BairdConservative

Committees of the House  Anyone, after hearing their story, would agree that they are owed compensation. They are owed an apology and they are owed the right to clear their names. It is a scar and a shame that the government refuses to do this.

December 3rd, 2009House debate

Mark HollandLiberal

Keeping Canadians Safe (International Transfer of Offenders) Act  Therefore, we have Canadian citizens serving their sentence in a foreign jurisdiction where they will get no treatment for their substance abuse problem, no treatment for their mental health problem, should they have one, and then they will be dropped back on Canadian soil and we will be left to pick up the pieces. Let us be clear about what those pieces will be. That individual's life will be in tatters, but there will be further victimization in all likelihood. Therefore, we create a situation that makes our communities less safe, it creates a higher likelihood of victimization and, at the end of the day, we will have to pay the price.

April 16th, 2010House debate

Mark HollandLiberal

Keeping Canadians Safe (International Transfer of Offenders) Act  Again, those considerations should surely help to guide decisions about whether to grant a request for transfer from an offender serving a sentence overseas. At the moment there is no clear legislative authority for the minister to take them into account. Bill C-5 would change that while also providing the minister with more flexibility in decision-making itself. The legislation that our government has introduced today is designed to keep Canadians safe.

April 16th, 2010House debate

Rick NorlockConservative

House debate  The potential for conflict of interest concerns was dealt with by all parties involved in the contribution agreement in accordance with legal advice. Because it was clear that Canadians would benefit from the proposal put forward, a contribution agreement was completed between the Government of Canada and Streetlight Intelligence Incorporated.

April 15th, 2010House debate

David AndersonConservative

Protection of Insignia of Military Orders, Decorations and Medals Act  Yet, when I have had the chance to speak with veterans in my hometown of Hamilton, like the exceptional men and women at Royal Canadian Legion Branch 163 on the Mountain, it is also clear that they are wearing those medals for the 118,000 Canadians who served their country and never had the chance to wear theirs because they made the ultimate sacrifice. From that perspective there can be little doubt that the principles underlying Bill C-473 deserve our support.

April 15th, 2010House debate

Chris CharltonNDP

Fairness for the Self-Employed Act  The Liberals will vote in favour of Bill C-56, but I want to be clear: we are urging the government to check its figures and to fix them if necessary.

December 2nd, 2009House debate

Raymonde FolcoLiberal

Protection of Insignia of Military Orders, Decorations and Medals Act  The stories we have of these medals, as we can look at them, tell the story of a nation that has taken its place in the stage of world affairs and has made our world a better place. It is very clear that I believe this is good legislation. It promotes culture and heritage in Canada and it balances the need for a family to tell its own story. It respects the right of a family to pass on a medal, or a declaration, or an award, from generation to generation, to kin, to keep it in that family so it can tell the story of the person it loved and respected.

April 15th, 2010House debate

Rob OliphantLiberal