Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 105736-105750 of 105781
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Cruise Missile Testing  As the NWT government leader recently stated: In our view, the cruise missile testing component of military activity in the Northwest Territories can no longer be justified given the significant changes which have occurred in the international arena during the past few years. I agree. Northerners recognize that although the cold war is over other security concerns have arisen.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Jack Iyerak AnawakLiberal

Cruise Missile Testing  In fact, I cannot find much evidence that supports the notion that the issue is a nuclear one any longer. The real issue as far as I can tell is that the technology may be too simple and therefore readily developable for conventional use. The excellent reports prepared by the Library of Parliament say this, for example: As the understandable pre-occupation with Superpower nuclear cruise missiles has diminished over the past several years, more attention has been paid to shorter-range and much simpler cruise weapons.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Elsie WayneProgressive Conservative

Cruise Missile Testing  The global context has changed, as was said earlier by members for the Reform Party and our own leader. It has changed in that we no longer have two blocs confronting each other but the occasional isolated conflict. As the hon. member for Saint-Jean said earlier, if we use these tests to enhance our security and concentrate more on ways to defend our democracy, we are less likely to put the lives of men, women and children and our armed personnel at risk.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Louis PlamondonBloc

Cruise Missile Testing  It is time to stop talking like cold war cavemen and cavewomen because we are living in another decade. The agenda has shifted very rapidly. It is no longer the agenda on how to prevent a strike or an attack that we should be concentrating our time and energy on. It is how to prevent the elements in the global community that have to do with, as I mentioned, poverty and environmental degradation, that have to be addressed and the energies of governments need to be focused on that agenda.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Charles CacciaLiberal

Cruise Missile Testing  It is somehow ironic this debate should take place today when last night President Clinton said in his speech: "Russia's strategic nuclear missiles soon will no longer be pointed at the United States. Nor will we point ours at them". He went on to say: "Instead of building weapons in space Russian scientists will help us build the international space station".

January 26th, 1994House debate

Charles CacciaLiberal

Cruise Missile Testing  In 1983 the current Minister of Human Resources Development and Western Economic Diversification, who was then minister of defence, signed the original test evaluation agreement with the U.S. Recently this minister claims that Canada no longer needs these tests because the cold war is over. The cold war may be over but this world is still if not more unstable than during the cold war period. Instead of having one major threat, we now have many smaller threats.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Dave ChattersReform

Cruise Missile Testing  You will agree with me that if the government decides that the collective security system which has been in place since the late forties is no longer adequate and that we must withdraw from it, such a decision will have a major impact on the continuation of the cruise missile tests conducted over the Canadian territory. Consequently, we cannot discuss this issue without first undertaking a comprehensive review of the Canadian defence policy.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Stéphane BergeronBloc

Cruise Missile Testing  In its 1992 defence policy, Canada recognized that the geopolitical environment had changed considerably and that the global balance of power was no longer based on a bipolar structure. We have witnessed the gradual emergence of new nuclear powers, which are often very politically unstable. Under such circumstances, it was risky for Canada and its allies to question the collective security system their defence policy had been built on since the days of the cold war.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Stéphane BergeronBloc

Cruise Missile Testing  I now think, in this new debate, that to protect democracy as such, in our country and everywhere else, it is important to be equipped with the proper tools, no longer aimed at massive destruction, but at delicate surgery to excise those threats to democracy. My question is this: After what I have said, do you agree that some countries should increase their activities against terrorism on the international level by using this type of surgical tool to strike down those anti-democratic offenders?

January 26th, 1994House debate

Claude BachandBloc

Cruise Missile Testing  Future versions of the cruise missile can be expected to display higher speeds, greater manoeuvrability, longer range, lower radar and other signatures, and penetration aids such as electronic counter measures. We see there has been a life and a history to the cruise missile. Even though the cold war is officially over, I think we realize there are still some hot spots, which we touched on yesterday, around the world.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Deborah GreyReform

Cruise Missile Testing  Speaker, the reason originally for the cruise missile testing in western and northern Canada was because the terrain of that particular part of Canada closely resembled that of the Soviet Union. Since the Soviet Union no longer exists and since the war areas in the world have been comparable to that of Iraq, being deserts, would it not be more appropriate for cruise missile testing, rather than being in Canada to be in areas comparable to that in Nevada.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Morris BodnarLiberal

Cruise Missile Testing  This is an agreement in support of a mutual defence pact which is of great value to Canada. It means a lot to our stability. The U.S.S.R. by and large has disappeared and is no longer an obvious threat. The area is certainly not under control. There is a lot of volatility there. When we think back to the Russians having constructed a very similar weapon to the one that is proposed to be tested over Canada, we have to consider that there are many countries in that region which have cash balance problems, foreign exchange problems.

January 26th, 1994House debate

Jack FrazerReform

Foreign Affairs  I have no personal connection with the military and no personal connection with the area under debate but I do know that currently Canadians are interested in the expenditures of their government and are even questioning the long term value of military expenditures. They no longer believe the Russians are coming and if they consider the concept of being defended they wish to be defended against threats to their security in terms of job loss, poverty, hunger, illness and the escalation of violence in their society.

January 25th, 1994House debate

Bonnie BrownLiberal

Foreign Affairs  Is it not marvellous to realize that, thanks to the United Nations peacekeeping operation, Somalis are no longer dying of starvation? And what about the remarkable success in Cambodia? That country went through a long and traumatic period, but can now look forward to a better future. As I mentioned, there are several difficulties that UN peacekeepers and especially our own troops are encountering in the former Yugoslavia.

January 25th, 1994House debate

Eleni BakopanosLiberal

Foreign Affairs  One of the principal arguments advanced by those who oppose the plans for the firing range is that we can no longer afford to have the armed forces play a traditional role in Canada today. These people want to transform CFB Bagotville into a training base for UN peacekeeping missions. While their intentions may be good, there are many problems underlying this proposal.

January 25th, 1994House debate

André CaronBloc