Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 141751-141765 of 141941
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

House Of Commons Standing Orders  Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for her question. I might not have made myself as clear as I should have. I was not saying that recall was the most important thing in the minds of Canadian voters. I was saying that if asked about these direct democracy measures, referenda, citizens' initiative, freer votes and recall, at either public meetings or through surveys we have always found recall to be the highest priority of those four direct democracy measures.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Preston ManningReform

House Of Commons Standing Orders  Under the freer vote convention we proposed we would still have parties. On most issues on which our platforms and commitments were clear and we were elected on the basis of those platforms and commitments we would continue to vote, for the most part, in accordance with those mandates. However, if from time to time there arose issues on which our constituents clearly wanted us to vote contrary to the party line we should have the freedom in this House to do so without being censured by our colleagues or maligned by the media as dissidents or pressured by party whips or party leaders to vote against our constituents' interests.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Preston ManningReform

House Of Commons Standing Orders  However, Bloc members did not receive a mandate from Quebec voters to reform federal institutions and, in this particular case, much less a mandate to reform the House of Commons which of all the institutions is the one largely responsible for Quebec's gradual, ongoing loss of political autonomy. The Bloc's mandate in this House is clear. It is to defend the interests of Quebec, according to parliamentary rules and traditions, while there is still time. The Bloc has a fundamental obligation to oppose any reform which is aimed at limiting the role of opposition members in controlling government activity.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Gaston LerouxBloc

Multiculturalism  Her department's mandate is to encourage a sense of Canadian cultural identity based on the main characteristics of Canada, which are bilingualism and multiculturalism. it is clear that the federal government's policies are more inclined to embrace the perspective of a hypothetical pan-Canadian cultural identity. Until Quebec has acquired full political sovereignty, we will defend Quebec's right to the recognition of its cultural identity.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Suzanne TremblayBloc

Public Works  I want to assure the hon. member that after the error was detected it was rectified within a two-week period at a cost of $150,000. I have given clear instructions to my staff at Public Works and Government Services Canada that that kind of behaviour will not be tolerated. In essence we have asked for a review and if necessary, disciplinary action will be taken.

February 7th, 1994House debate

David DingwallLiberal

Bosnia-Herzegovina  The former government did sign on with the rest of the NATO nations in not ruling out air strikes in certain eventualities. However the Prime Minister made it clear in Brussels that linkage of air strikes with an attempt to open the airport at Tuzla and to liberate the Canadian contingent at Srebrenica was just not acceptable to the Canadian government.

February 7th, 1994House debate

David CollenetteLiberal

Cigarette Smuggling  Mr. Speaker, the position of the government is clear. It intends to have the law enforced everywhere in Canada. That continues to be our position. It is not a matter of looking for confrontation but instead, of enforcing the law in an equal manner in every part of the country.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Herb GrayLiberal

Cigarette Smuggling  Speaker, and to dispel any doubt or confusion people may have, including the inhabitants of these native reserves, could the Prime Minister agree to a request to meet with Mohawk chiefs and make it clear to them that he intends to ensure that the rule of law is applied everywhere in Canada?

February 7th, 1994House debate

Michel GauthierBloc

House Of Commons Standing Orders  Some likely valid reasons for a petition could be a criminal act by a member, a proven failure to vote in accordance with the clear majority wish of the constituents, misrepresentation, for example, as has been recently revealed in the House, and so on. In places like California, Montana and North Dakota recall legislation exists with petitions thresholds of less than 20 per cent.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Ted WhiteReform

House Of Commons Standing Orders  One of the most visible and contentious areas which requires change is the pensions for members of Parliament. During the election there was a clear message that we must return to an understanding we are the representatives of the people and as true representatives we must understand and appreciate the values of those we represent, values of equity, fairness and service.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Murray CalderLiberal

House Of Commons Standing Orders  They still want to be able to vote against a bill, even if they have drafted, asked for the adoption of or voted in favour of an amendment to a given clause, in order to limit the subject matter of a bill they intend to fight. That should be made perfectly clear so that opposition members are not used to rubber stamp a bill they disagree with. I do think that the government will have a huge responsibility in that matter. Democracy should not be held hostage by cunning manoeuvring.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Gilles DuceppeBloc

House Of Commons Standing Orders  They are disheartened by what they read in the newspapers and see on television every day. Last fall people from coast to coast delivered a very clear message by electing more than 200 new members to this House. The people want to see some changes. They are dissatisfied because they were not always consulted, because their opinions were not always taken into consideration, and because important decisions were often made behind closed doors.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Fernand RobichaudLiberal

House Of Commons Standing Orders  We in the Reform Party are fundamentally committed to changing the way business is conducted in Parliament so the people of Canada and the members of Parliament who represent them can gain some influence over the policy making process. In our party platform, devised long before the call of the last election, we made it clear we did not believe this place was functioning in a way that best served the people. We proposed in our platform changes which we believe would give members some influence over the policy making process of government.

February 7th, 1994House debate

Daphne JenningsReform

Crown Liability And Proceedings Act  In the last Parliament we listened to lawyers and experts from across Canada who had the view, as did many members, that the issue of water was not clear. In fact they could have access to our water either through the free trade agreement or the NAFTA. Many of us were very concerned about that. I give credit to the minister of trade who went the extra distance to cite water specifically.

February 4th, 1994House debate

Dennis MillsLiberal

Department Of National Revenue Act  As national revenue minister, the hon. minister has said that the role of customs is essential to the social and economic well being of the country. As I mentioned earlier, Revenue Canada customs will continue to have a clear mandate to enforce Canadian law and sovereignty at the border by preventing the entry of criminals, illegal immigrants, pornographic material, prohibited goods and weapons. As well, a mandate to protect Canadian business and industry by administering international trade agreements.

February 4th, 1994House debate

Susan WhelanLiberal