Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act   ways the pensions of RCMP officers paid for corporate tax cuts. That is just like the employment insurance premiums that RCMP officers have to pay, which they cannot collect by the way. That money, over $56 billion, accumulated by Liberals and Conservatives went toward the deficit

Employment Insurance Act   the EI fund to pay off all sorts of things, including giving corporate tax cuts at the expense of workers when they are laid off. What happened to that $56 billion surplus in the EI fund, which was put there through the hard work of Canadians? Where did that money go? When we talk

BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION ACT, 2009   the employment insurance fund and took money from the old age guaranteed income supplement fund. So they owe income money to seniors. Should the Liberals be next in office, could the money from the old age guaranteed income supplement—money taken from seniors, the $55 billion or $56

Budget Implementation Act, 2008   of Parliament to do an analysis. The analysis showed that there was roughly $56 billion in federal corporate tax cuts from 2001 to 2007. Based on that amount, we could build every pending school project 177 times. When we tried to get a list of what schools were pending for construction

Budget Implementation Act, 2008   to November 2002. What is this theft of $56 billion going to do? What is the message that those of us here are sending to these unemployed workers?

Budget Implementation Act, 2008   it and therefore pay interest. Does the hon. member think it is fair that the money the workers put aside is now being taken away, the entire $56 billion, and instead they are forced to borrow money in future and have to pay the interest. Is that fair?

Human Resources committee   to out-of-work Canadians increases by approximately $3 billion. So the $2 billion reserve of the board is depleted and the EI account has to borrow $1 billion from the government, even though we already have this $54 billion to $56 billion in the current notional EI account. So the EI

Human Resources committee   there. Am I correct? There is no $56 billion sitting there. It's notional.

Human Resources committee  Just as clarification, we can't build policy around something that's in a dream or around some notional fund. I just want that clarified, so we can quit talking about or referring to this $56 billion. This is why all these changes have to be made.

Hazardous Products Act   of fatalities in the home is careless smoking. On average, Canadians consume approximately 56 billion cigarettes annually and the damage caused by them is substantial. There are 56 billion cigarettes in the hands of individuals and they are sometimes used carelessly.The bill certainly

Natural Resources committee   $56 billion would get us to two million barrels per day, and projections or the vision for Alberta looks to be on tap for three million and five million respectively in 2020 and 2030 potentially. From that business case in 2005, the revenues that flow to the federal government

Agriculture committee   of the benefits of more open trade for Canada and for the world are as high as $56 billion U.S. annually. The Doha development round of the WTO, launched in 2001, is a chance in a generation for countries to address unfair subsidies and access barriers, to create a better trading environment

International Trade committee   for Canadian producers, processors, and exporters. Estimates of the benefits of more open trade for Canada and for the world are as high as U.S. $56 billion annually. CAFTA's long-term objective is global free trade in agricultural and agrifood products. This will allow Canada's

Budget Implementation Act, 2005   are saving each and every year because of the $56 billion that we have paid down against the debt. It is in excess of $3 billion annually. By the way, that is a permanent annuity. That is $3 billion each and every year into the future. As we pay down more debt that $3 billion will grow

Supply   spending $56 billion, and it is estimated that, in 2010, which is really not too far in the future, they will be spending $85 billion. It must be remembered that, when hospital insurance was first introduced back in 1957, the federal government had made the commitment to cover 50