Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 106-120 of 139840
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Privilege   director seems to accept, based on the committee’s report. According to the report, at page 85, “Mr. Vigneault’s understanding...that it was clear that [the minister] never saw the IMU and that he had no reason to doubt [the minister] on that point.” Faced with a similar situation

May 2nd, 2024House debate

The SpeakerLiberal

Intergovernmental Affairs   that they want to exert control over Quebec. However, the unanimous response from the Quebec National Assembly yesterday was clear: We, Quebeckers, always want to be masters in our own house. Does the Minister of Finance realize that Quebeckers do not want the neighbouring country's elected

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Gabriel Ste-MarieBloc

Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act   in favour of sending the bill to committee. I was prepared to participate in committee discussions and to try to improve it. This was the goal of the Bloc Québécois and its approach to studying the bill. However, the main problem soon became clear. Bill C-49 is not about renewable

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Mario SimardBloc

Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act  Mr. Speaker, the answer is very clear. I find it intriguing that the hon. member from the Bloc Québécois is raising a concern about how we are standing up to reflect the concerns that stakeholders and provinces have raised. These concerns are regarding way too much power being

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Richard BragdonConservative

Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act   tugging. The hill was steep, the challenge immense, Yet the Little Engine, with confidence, Chanted its mantra, clear and loud, “I think I can, I'm strong and proud.” Up the hill, the Little Engine strained, Raindrops falling, courage gained. “I think I can, I think I can

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Richard BragdonConservative

Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act   the world as it is. They accept opportunities for what they are, and they are clear-eyed about it. Between the Minister of Rural Economic Development, the member for Avalon, the member for Bonavista—Burin—Trinity, the member for Labrador, the member for St. John's East and me, we knew

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Seamus O'ReganLiberal

Human Resources committee  Okay. I see no further discussion. Mrs. Gray's motion is clear. I have agreed that it is in order. Madam Clerk, we'll go to a recorded vote on the motion of Mrs. Gray. (Motion negatived: nays 7; yeas 4) The motion has been defeated. Committee members, there are just

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

The ChairLiberal

Human Resources committee   there are replacement workers, and also at Videotron. It's clear for them: If the bill were to come into force soon, it would resolve the dispute, but it wouldn't deal with their situation.

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

Louise ChabotBloc

Justice committee   for your decisions. I'm not impugning the motives of someone who would support this legislation. I'm saying it's very clear that passing this bill is being used—

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

Rob MooreConservative

Human Resources committee  Sure. Direct your questions to whomever you choose. We'll go to the departmental staff, and then if that's not clear we'll go further.

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

The ChairLiberal

Human Resources committee   a step, essentially, before the employer can use the exception listed here. I'm happy to elaborate on that. I don't know if that's clear.

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

Ryan Cowling

Justice committee   was that the minister was committed to working towards a goal of achieving something in the spirit of what the “teachers” had proposed. I want to set the record clear on that. A number of comments were made today by members of this committee. To suggest that any member of Parliament, any member

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

James MaloneyLiberal

Human Resources committee  I think subsection 94(5) might be problematic, actually. It's about “continuing services”. Basically, your government wants to make it clear that using replacement workers is prohibited. I understand that it's an agreement you've defended together, but you added

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

Louise ChabotBloc

Human Resources committee   mounted. Rather than immediately trigger a total strike on certain days, or a general unlimited strike, a step-by-step process is possible. We, and many union organizations, don't think the act is clear with respect to when replacement workers can be used during partial or rotating

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Human Resources committee   of a contractor who was used before the notice to bargain was sent. That is evidently contrary to the objective of the bill, if that is in fact its objective. If the objective is to have a clear conscience and tell ourselves we have accomplished something, that is one thing, but I urge

May 2nd, 2024Committee meeting

Louise ChabotBloc