Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Petitions of electoral reform legislation that incorporates real recommendations of Elections Canada to get to the bottom of fraud or corrupt or illegal practices, which is exactly the opposite of the unfair elections act.
April 10th, 2014House debate
Craig ScottNDP
Privilege misleading the House in order to justify its wrong-headed policies. The opposition to the unfair elections act is mounting and virtually unanimous. Conservatives stand to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters who, by many assessments, are coincidentally not usually Conservative
April 10th, 2014House debate
Peter JulianNDP
Business of Supply parties. It was the current Prime Minister who said that this was an abuse of power; this was wrong. Lo and behold, we now have Bill C-23, the unfair elections act, which the Conservatives have designed in its very DNA to be unfair, to be undemocratic, and to allow an advantage
April 10th, 2014House debate
Business of Supply of the unfair elections act. The Liberal Party has been strongly criticized in civil society groups and community organizations across the country for not having been on this file at all. It is important that the Liberals are now getting involved in what is a pretty fundamental issue
April 10th, 2014House debate
Peter JulianNDP
Business of Supply . That flaw was especially revealed in the way that the Conservative government has operated with respect to Bill C-23, the fair or unfair elections act, whatever members want to call it, depending on their perspective, and how the regime would impose its will to the exclusion of all other
April 10th, 2014House debate
Wayne EasterLiberal
Business of Supply to allow those Conservatives who have the integrity to stand in their place and say what is happening today with the elections act. It is not the fair elections act, it is the unfair elections act, and the Conservatives know it. This is a Conservative elections act. However, we
April 10th, 2014House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Democratic Reform Abuse is okay, Mr. Speaker, but it is unacceptable levels of abuse that are not okay. I get it. We would like to know why that minister thinks that compelling the production of documents is a good idea, and yet the minister responsible for the unfair elections act refuses
April 28th, 2014House debate
Conservative Party of Canada Thank you, Mr. Speaker. He also managed the Conservatives' 2004 campaign. How does this stalwart of the Reform-Conservative movement describe his old friend these days? On the weekend, Mr. Flanagan said the unfair elections act shows the ruthless, vindictive, and hyper
April 30th, 2014House debate
Dan HarrisNDP
Democratic Reform the Conservatives' unfair elections act, forcing them to accept amendments to Bill C-23. I also see hope in the widespread support that has greeted the important private member's bill, the reform act by the Conservative MP for Wellington—Halton Hills, which would allow MPs to return to working
April 30th, 2014House debate
Bruce HyerGreen
Procedure and House Affairs committee forced to agree to, this bill will be better than Bill C-23, that is, the unfair elections act, as tabled by the minister, but it will be still much worse than leaving the current Canada Elections Act in place.
May 1st, 2014Committee meeting
Craig ScottNDP
Democratic Reform Mr. Speaker, some amendments to the unfair elections act are finally being accepted after overwhelming criticism of the bill from experts and ordinary Canadians alike. However, the government still refuses to give investigators the power to get to the bottom of election fraud
May 1st, 2014House debate
Bruce HyerGreen
Business of the House the Speaker of the House have to call this government to order. Now the government seems to be doing the same thing with Bill C-23, the unfair elections act. The committee was working to address many of the problems that exist in the bill. The NDP, as it always does, offered sound
May 1st, 2014House debate
Peter JulianNDP
Procedure and House Affairs committee Yeah, well, I'm not sure the public is going to be particularly impressed by that “hear, hear”, given that this committee now has to go through over 200 pages of the unfair elections act and dozens and dozens of amendments without even having any sort of debate. My question
May 1st, 2014Committee meeting
Peter JulianNDP
Procedure and House Affairs committee We don't agree with it. It's wrong. It should be the unfair elections act. (Short title agreed to: yeas 5; nays 4)
May 1st, 2014Committee meeting
First Nations Control of First Nations Education Act that the Conservatives maintain is unbelievable. We have also suggested this. The Conservatives refused, on their unfair elections act, to have parliamentary hearings outside of Ottawa, because the Conservatives wanted to keep the conversation in the bubble as they were rigging our electoral process
May 2nd, 2014House debate