Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023   Canada and Finance Canada. What do they all have in common? It is the $54-million ArriveCAN app. The member sat with me on committee yesterday and voted against a common-sense motion to cut red tape, so he is upside down. He obviously wrote his speech two days ago. Could he clarify

Transport committee   raised now on multiple occasions by departmental officials, so we'll be voting against this.

Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023  Madam Speaker, what we voted against, what will continue to vote against and what we always have voted against is a punitive carbon tax that the NDP-Liberal government is more than happy to put on Canadians. It is so ideologically obsessed with the carbon tax and ensuring people

Human Resources committee   to support the rights of Indigenous parents, the Liberals voted against it. We saw this again, and it just doesn't make sense. I sense her frustration greatly today. I can feel it from her. I think that if we want to have a great country, we have to have healthy kids, and kids need

Justice committee  -partisan in a number of different facets. This Liberal government is saying that they don't want to look at this and there's nothing to see here. We know that the Liberals will vote against this. The question for me, really, is whether the NDP will again go along in their act as part

Government Operations committee  , it was going to be done after that anyway. Mr. Johns still chose to vote against the privilege motion, so he has to be held accountable for being part of this cover-up, part of failing to support our motion to actually allow this issue to be properly considered. Further to that, we have

Government Operations committee   me wondering whether we have any alternative remedy available to us, or if it's simply inferred to be the will of the two parties that voted against it to essentially shut down this issue.

Committees of the House  Madam Speaker, we voted against the government and that member who sent turbines to Russia to fund Putin's war machine. We voted against a government that sent detonators overseas to be used by Russia, that are blowing up and killing Ukrainians. We voted against a government

Committees of the House  Madam Speaker, Conservatives last week had the opportunity to vote non-confidence in the government because we do not have confidence in the government. We have had the opportunity to do that dozens and dozens of times, just like we will vote against a Liberal budget

Prohibition of the Export of Horses by Air for Slaughter Act  . This is absolutely frustrating, not only for my constituents but also for all farmers. It is a slippery slope. I urge all my colleagues in the House to vote against this bill.

Government Operations committee  We posted so many good amendments. There were 15 good amendments. This is one of the ones the Liberals voted against, unfortunately, and it didn't pass. To understand why the government seals voted against it, we needed to see what the department of bureaucrats told them

Government Operations committee  . Mr. Masse, we should probably do some access to information on the reasons the government voted against your amendment. You would think that voting against your amendments would motivate you to want to make sure there was more openness and transparency here. However, apparently we

Innovation, Science and Industry   investigations. The Auditor General is also investigating. It does not take an ethicist to see the ethical breach here. Surprisingly, however, the Bloc Québécois voted against an investigation by the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics to shed light on the green

Carbon Pricing  Mr. Speaker, the reason we voted against them is that we voted non-confidence in this government. Medicine Hat and the area is home to numerous greenhouse operations like Big Marble Farms, which grows fresh vegetables like cucumbers, peppers and tomatoes. This year alone, Big

Public Accounts committee   very much at a loss for words. I believe that it is absolutely inappropriate for this to be at this committee. I would urge members to vote against this. I think that this is something that needs to be dealt with, if even dealt with at the federal level, at the environment committee