Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Immigration Mr. Speaker, we tabled the immigration plan at three o'clock yesterday. At one o'clock we briefed my respective critics. At 12.28 yesterday on CP wire, without an iota of a figure being deposited, his hon. critic for immigration said the following: Immigrants are choking
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Sergio MarchiLiberal
Immigration More, more.
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Some hon. members
Immigration In the heat of exchange I know my colleagues sometimes forget the Speaker. I know it is an oversight because here I am. However I wish you would direct your responses and your questions through me, please.
February 3rd, 1994House debate
The Speaker
Immigration Mr. Speaker, I have a supplementary question for the minister. If the minister were to be presented with studies that maintaining immigration levels at the 250,000 level under current circumstances does not produce a net economic benefit to Canada, would the minister consider
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Preston ManningReform
Immigration Mr. Speaker, a number of studies have been produced in terms of the relationship between net immigration and net economic benefit. In fact, if I were to say something, there probably would not be enough studies in the current time to correlate those two forces a little more
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Sergio MarchiLiberal
Immigration Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. None of us in the House question the value and importance of immigration, but legitimate questions exist concerning the appropriate levels of immigration. As the minister knows, 2.3 million Canadians
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Preston ManningReform
Immigration Mr. Speaker, we consulted Canadians in the last election. One of the commitments we made in the red book was a commitment to move our immigration policy toward a 1 per cent level. That commitment was not undertaken lightly. That commitment had the foresight of some study
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Sergio MarchiLiberal
Immigration Mr. Speaker, I thank the minister for his answer. In light of his answer can the minister prove, by laying before the House a detailed cost benefit analysis or other evidence, that maintaining immigration at the level of 250,000 immigrants per year is a net economic benefit
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Preston ManningReform
Immigration Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration on his announcement yesterday in the House of the 1994 immigration levels. His announcement is in keeping with the pledge in the red book to maintain an immigration level of approximately 1 per
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Jean AugustineLiberal
Social Security System . I urge the present government to hear Canadians from all backgrounds tell it that they want most of all to be Canadian. New Canadians need to have the opportunity and access to jobs and must be given that opportunity by wise immigration policies. It is the economic health of all
February 3rd, 1994House debate
Sharon HayesReform
Social Security System . For example KAON and TRIUMF spend approximately $30 million a year for research. The spin-off to industries such as the Ebco Industries Ltd. in Richmond, British Columbia, a company that started as a small tool manufacturing company developed by two German immigrant brothers has been
February 2nd, 1994House debate
Ted McWhinneyLiberal
Social Security System . It is also unfair when immigrants and new citizens find no orderly process for accreditation of their foreign obtained credentials. It is unfair when you are unable to work because of an illness, injury or physical disability and are not provided with a means of overcoming
February 2nd, 1994House debate
Rey D. PagtakhanLiberal
Social Security System and with Canadians a very specific initiative that the then Minister of Employment and Immigration-today he is responsible for human resources-put forward. It was November 10, 1982. I went to the Library of Parliament on Monday morning to pull this out. It was called the New Employment Expansion
February 2nd, 1994House debate
Dennis MillsLiberal
Points Of Order and will take them to heart. I do not need again to point out that Canada is indeed a nation of immigrants. The country as we know it today would not exist were it not for the ambition, struggle and determination of millions of people who have landed on our shores in search of a better life
February 2nd, 1994House debate
Art HangerReform
Points Of Order Madam Speaker, I listened very closely to the statement of the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. However, I must deplore the minister's failure to co-operate with critics from the other parties. We did not receive the text of his statement-a document prepared months ago
February 2nd, 1994House debate
Osvaldo NunezBloc