Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 2221-2235 of 2246
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Resumption and Continuation of Postal Services Legislation  Mr. Speaker, I greatly appreciate this very pertinent question which allows me to set some things right. Perhaps my colleague is not very familiar with labour relations. For the past nine years, I served as a union representative with the Canadian Union of Public Employees. I c

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Resumption and Continuation of Postal Services Legislation  Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the hon. member for her question. I appreciate the message she just read. I understand how difficult the situation is for that person's business. Indeed, it is not funny. I just want to make a correction: I take issue with a word that was used in tha

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Resumption and Continuation of Postal Services Legislation  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for the excellent question. This is a very troubling start for this new Conservative majority government, which seems to be very proud of the strong mandate it was given, as it likes to repeat when answering every other question. They are off to

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Resumption and Continuation of Postal Services Legislation  Mr. Speaker, I would like first to say I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Vancouver East. Today is a dark day for Canada. The tabling of Bill C-6 is a blot on respect for democratic rights and workers’ right of association. This day will not go down in history as

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Resumption and Continuation of Postal Services Legislation  Mr. Speaker, since this morning, our Conservative Party colleagues have been shedding crocodile tears over the fate of small and medium-sized businesses, while forgetting the fundamental fact that the current dispute at Canada Post is a lockout. That makes all the difference in t

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

G8 Summit  Mr. Speaker, the member for Parry Sound—Muskoka approved $50 million worth of projects that benefited his friends. This is so suspicious that the RCMP is investigating. Today, members representing ridings that did not benefit from this preferential treatment are asking legitimate

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

G8 Summit  Mr. Speaker, I have a figure that is of interest to all of us. Had the President of the Treasury Board approved $50 million worth of projects in all of the country's other ridings, it would have cost the public treasury $15 billion. This gives some idea of the extent of the dubio

June 23rd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, with regard to the member for Parry Sound—Muskoka's $50 million in unjustified expenses, his spokesperson stated that the RCMP investigation was, and I quote, a “public relations stunt”. That is interesting. During the days of the infamous sponsorship scandal, the me

June 22nd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, when the member for Calgary Southwest was in the opposition, he himself said that the Liberal government, with its history—

June 22nd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Government Accountability  Mr. Speaker, when the member for Calgary Southwest was in opposition, he himself said that the Liberal government, with its history of scandals and refusal to accept responsibility, had not earned the right to be given the benefit of the doubt. The Conservatives were found in co

June 22nd, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Auditor General's Report  Mr. Speaker, yesterday, I once again asked the member for Parry Sound—Muskoka to explain the $50 million spending spree. Unfortunately, his critic was unable to tell us why documents explaining how projects were selected were unavailable. The President of the Treasury Board stil

June 21st, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Auditor General's Report  Mr. Speaker, the President of the Treasury Board is attempting to spend $50 million without justification; however, this is so suspicious that it has sparked an RCMP investigation. We are now realizing that this government’s actions look a lot like what the Liberals did during

June 21st, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Government Spending  Mr. Speaker, it has been almost two weeks now since the Auditor General criticized the former industry minister's misuse and waste of public funds to benefit his friends. Yet the former minister has still not apologized and has not provided details on the projects that were chose

June 20th, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

Government Spending  Mr. Speaker, the 2011-12 main estimates will soon be examined in parliamentary committee. The President of the Treasury Board has agreed to testify, but only for one hour. But we think that it must have taken much more than an hour to set up his $50 million plan for the G8 summit

June 20th, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP

G8 Summit  Mr. Speaker, now that we know that the President of the Treasury Board is able to stand, I would like to give him a third opportunity to tell Canadians about his use of the border infrastructure fund for projects in his riding, which is 300 kilometres from the border. How can th

June 15th, 2011House debate

Alexandre BoulericeNDP