Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1336-1350 of 1839
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice  Mr. Speaker, for the last 13 days the Prime Minister's answers on this issue have been all over the map. First he denied. Then there was a whisper campaign out of his office, insulting and disparaging the former attorney general. Now there is the answer of “It's not my fault; it

February 19th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  That was not an answer, Mr. Speaker, and it is frankly embarrassing to see the government House leader do that. There is nobody who is watching this scandal saying that there is nothing to see here. From political commentators to the media to legal experts, there are questions t

February 19th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Points of Order  Mr. Speaker, in light of the fact that the former attorney general indicated that she abstained from this vote because she believes she has a personal interest in the result of this vote, I would look to you for guidance. I think both the Prime Minister and the current Attorney G

February 20th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Points of Order  Could the member please not yell? Could I please have some respect? I know the Liberals do not like it when strong women speak. Mr. Speaker, we would like to get some guidance from you as to whether the Prime Minister's vote and the vote of the current Attorney General should b

February 20th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, what we know and what is undisputed is that subsequent to the September 4 decision that was delivered to SNC-Lavalin, there were numerous meetings between the Prime Minister and the former attorney general, and even between the Clerk of the Privy Council and the form

February 21st, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, here is the simple question we have been asking all day yesterday and today, and to which we still have not received an answer. Who called for the meeting between the Prime Minister and the former attorney general on September 17? Who asked for that meeting?

February 21st, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Business of the House  Mr. Speaker, I know the government House leader was quite busy today during question period not answering questions, but I think this one she will be able to answer. I have full confidence that she will be able to answer what we will be doing for the remainder of this week in the

February 21st, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister cannot seem to take no for an answer. When the former attorney general said that, no, she was not going to give SNC-Lavalin a deal, he was not happy, so he sent in his two top people, Telford and Butts, the two people who spoke directly for him, to

February 25th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, we know the Prime Minister sent in his highest-ranking people, who speak on his behalf, to pressure and persuade the former attorney general through her chief of staff. Canadians deserve to know what kind of pressure was applied to their attorney general. The only pe

February 25th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is preventing the former attorney general from speaking. She specifically said that he is preventing her from speaking about her time when she was veterans affairs minister, about the conversations they had just before she resigned, specifically in

February 27th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, if we need to hear all perspectives, then we need to hear her full perspective. Will the Prime Minister do this very simple thing. Will he write a letter right now, he has just over an hour, and tell the former attorney general that she can speak about the time whe

February 27th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Request for Emergency Debate  Mr. Speaker, I am rising today to seek leave for the adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing an important matter requiring urgent consideration pursuant to Standing Order 52. Yesterday, we heard compelling, convincing and very credible testimony from the former at

February 28th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, yesterday Canadians were told by the former attorney general that on September 17, in relation to the SNC-Lavalin affair, the Prime Minister told her that there is an election in Quebec and that “I am an MP in Quebec, the member for Papineau.” Does the Prime Ministe

February 28th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Justice  Mr. Speaker, he does not deny it. Clearly, the former attorney general is telling the truth. I have another question for the Prime Minister. Yesterday, the former attorney general also testified that Mathieu Bouchard, a senior adviser in the Prime Minister's Office, tried to pre

February 28th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative

Business of the House  Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to ask the government House leader to let us know what we might be doing when we return. We are very concerned with some of the things that are happening and we would like to get some clarity on what is going to be happening the

February 28th, 2019House debate

Candice BergenConservative