Agriculture committee  I will repeat the motion, yes. Colleagues, there will be a vote, and it is on the amendment to the motion from Mr. Barlow, which reads: That the clerk and the analysts be instructed to prepare a brief report for the committee outlining the material facts of the potential

Jewish Canadians  All those opposed to the hon. member's moving the motion will please say nay. There is no objection. The House has heard the terms of the motion. All those opposed to the motion will please say nay. (Motion agreed to)

Corrections and Conditional Release Act  The question is on the motion. If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate

Corrections and Conditional Release Act   and victims to relive their trauma. This bill seeks to ensure that maximum-security offenders remain in a maximum-security facility, where they deserve to be. I would once again like to thank my colleague from Niagara Falls, who introduced a similar bill, as well as a motion calling

National Council for Reconciliation Act  The question is on the motion. If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate

National Council for Reconciliation Act   indigenous peoples, and the Native Women's Association of Canada, an organization that represents women and children on and off reserve. At committee, our Conservative team, the Bloc and NDP members passed a motion to include these two national organizations. However, when the rubber hit

Agriculture committee  I think that was a dilatory motion. Is that correct? I think you just moved a motion to go directly to a vote. Ms. Taylor Roy, I'm going to give you just a few minutes to get back to your seat so that we can allow the vote to be called. Ms. Taylor Roy, there has been a motion

Agriculture committee  Thank you, Chair. I want to thank everyone, and yes, this committee does work well together. I tabled a notice of motion the other day and I hope everyone got it. I'd like to table that motion. It's about protecting farmland, and I think this is the perfect spot to do

Agriculture committee  Thanks, Mr. Chair. I disagree with your reading, because I think the motion actually does instruct you to report it to the House. I want to follow on Mr. Perron's suggestion. I do believe that it would be prudent for us, as a committee, to review this, so I would suggest

Agriculture committee   of it. Today I am informed of a motion that I did not receive in advance. I know you wanted to put it forward today, but it would have been helpful to distribute it to us before the meeting. As I said, I don't think anyone would disagree with the basic principle. Witnesses do indeed have

Committees of the House  All those opposed to the hon. member's moving the motion will please say nay. It is agreed. The House has heard the terms of the motion. All those opposed to the motion will please say nay. (Motion agreed to)

Agriculture committee  Similarly, I think the idea has merit. I would vote to adjourn the debate on this motion because I need more time to contemplate it. In British Columbia, we have the Agricultural Land Reserve. I don't know of any opportunity for the federal government to get involved

Agriculture committee  It is crystal clear to me as the chair. If we are okay to move Mr. MacGregor's amendment to Mr. Barlow's motion, what that would mean is that the clerk and the analysts will go do the work. We will contemplate this further down the road when they have the time to do it. If we

Agriculture committee  The motion has been distributed to everyone's personal account now. We could just move the motion on division if you're not comfortable having a specific vote, Ms. Taylor Roy, but I do think that there's a consensus to move with what Mr. MacGregor has proposed. Are we good

Agriculture committee   of horses for slaughter and to make related amendments to certain acts. It stops there. To Mr. Drouin's point, Mr. Barlow's original motion contemplated this motion passing right away: “and that the chair be instructed to present the report to the House forthwith.” That has since been