Supply   and the pleasure of working for the prime minister of Canada at that time, the Right Honourable Pierre Elliott Trudeau. One of the central themes of the prime minister was the Constitution. One of the areas within the Constitution the prime minister was passionately committed to was the whole

Organized Crime   and business scams. Earlier this month, the 10 month undercover police sting at Edmonton led to 51 drug trafficking, possession and conspiracy charges against 10 gang members. This is what the police seized: $800,000 worth of property including two homes, one worth $350,000 and the other

Property Rights   in our Constitution. The right to hold and enjoy property provides one of the checks and balances against undue concentration of power in government at any level”. Even the creator of big government, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, was an advocate of property rights during

Property Rights  , Paul Martin Sr., Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Brian Mulroney and many others. Again I would suggest there is a tradition to be followed. There is an opportunity now for this House to put these rights in place to ensure that inequities as they arise from ownership of property are going

Income Tax Amendments Act, 1997   in the botched Pearson contract buyout. It is something for the member to stand in his place and remind Canadians, like rubbing salt in the wounds, about what a terrible, atrocious job he and this government did in reversing the contract rights of people who had a vested interest

Supply   the position it is taking? I sat as a Liberal member of parliament for 12 years. I was a Liberal for many years before then. I was a Liberal when Pierre Trudeau was the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and when he was the prime minister of Canada. Pierre Trudeau would never have taken

Supply  , in 1980 the Government of Quebec and all the people of Quebec voted on a rather specific question concerning sovereignty-association. The federal government of the day, led by Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, accepted the rules for consultation of the people of Quebec. They said

An Act For The Recognition And Protection Of Human Rights And Fundamental Freedoms   are we here? It is our duty as parliamentarians to be sure that the foundation, the fundamentals, of our society are right. That is what Bill C-304 is all about. Former Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau argued long and hard for better protection of property rights, first in his

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act   is clear, and comes right from the mouth of the President of Treasury Board: “Creation of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency is an essential component of the government's commitment to modernize the federal public service”. Now we can see, the cat is out of the bag. While claiming

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, the signatories of the petition I am tabling today are calling upon parliament to support Private Member's Bill C-304, which would strengthen the protection in the Canadian Bills of Rights for property rights.

Marine Conservation Areas Act   to the lands to be included in the marine conservation area is vested in Her Majesty in right of Canada”—this of course being the Queen of England—excluding any such lands situated within the exclusive economic zone of Canada”. A highly complicated way of putting it. It must be noted

First Nations Land Management Act   is, and it appears as though it is, to remove the burden of the act in order to give all aboriginals the right to acquire personal wealth and property which all other Canadians enjoy, then why does it not declare its intentions and just do away with the Indian Act altogether? That would certainly

Criminal Code   on those who repeatedly trespass on the private property or dwelling houses from which they have already been lawfully prohibited or removed. As mentioned, the bill would amend section 41 of the Criminal Code to make it a summary conviction offence for a person who has been already

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act  . What the minister came up with is not a mere collection agency, but a terrible bureaucratic monster, which threatens the confidentiality of personal information, the rights of revenue department employees, and the provincial powers relating to revenue collection. Even the business

Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act   hat like a rabbit, is not an innocuous collection agency, but an evil creature, a bureaucratic monster that threatens privacy, the rights of Revenue Canada workers as well as provincial jurisdiction over tax collection. Even the business community is against the creation