Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 17
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Accounts committee  Yes. What we're finding generally across the country is that the vast, vast majority of projects will finish on time for the deadline. The data does come in regularly, so right now we're looking at about 3% to 5% of the projects that we have put at risk of not being completed by

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  It would be roughly a little over 100 projects, though I would caution that we just got some recent data from Quebec for the first time--sort of detailed project data that we're analyzing.

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  Can I just make two points on that? One, as I said, the data does change as we get new information--

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  --and two, these are projects that we have flagged at risk for extra monitoring. It doesn't mean they won't finish; it means they're large or they were delayed enough. It also doesn't mean that the full federal share of those projects won't be spent. So the large portion could be

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  Sorry, could you repeat the last part of the question?

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  For the first part of your question, the documents we've just recently received from the minister in Quebec give us an update on the status of their projects, so we're in the process of analyzing that information. We'd be happy to talk to the Government of Quebec just to make sur

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  I don't know right now. I don't have the detailed data for each project. However, there are two types of funds. There is the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, with a deadline of March 2011, and there are regular programs, like the Building Canada Fund, which is a seven-year program,

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  That's a very good observation. As for what we did as part of our streamlining to accelerate...normally for a contribution program you'd wait until you signed a contribution agreement. By and large for almost all the projects, our money flowed through the provinces, which then di

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  No, I think that's a reasonably good assessment. But as I said, it varies across the country. Our general sense at the moment, depending on the data we get, is around 3% to 5%, so the vast majority of projects will come in by the program deadline. Each one has some different reas

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

John Forster

Transport committee  The item in the supplementary estimates (C) in terms of the reduction in the green infrastructure fund is just a re-profiling from this fiscal year to future fiscal years, to match the rate of construction and the rate at which the provinces are building the projects.

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

John Forster

Transport committee  Right. Exactly.

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

John Forster

Transport committee  To be honest, I'm not familiar with the specifics. As you know, in the north our Building Canada money flows through an agreement with the territories whereby they propose projects to us. But I'm happy to--

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

John Forster

Transport committee  I'm happy to look into it and get back to you. I'm not familiar with it.

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  I'm John Forster, Associate Deputy Minister, infrastructure.

November 2nd, 2011Committee meeting

John Forster

Public Accounts committee  Yes, in the end the fund was approved for $50 million; about $45.7 million was approved for projects, and the final expenditures were $44.8 million. All bills and claims have been paid out and verified with reports.

November 2nd, 2011Committee meeting

John Forster