Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-65 of 65
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  Indeed, you're absolutely correct, it's an issue that we've considered very carefully and seriously over the years, because it has been raised by various interests, not just the port authorities but those that use the ports and those that benefit from the cargo that is either imp

December 6th, 2007Committee meeting

Emile Di Sanza

Transport committee  If we are talking about the St. Lawrence Seaway and the Great Lakes—in some cases, goods that move through the St. Lawrence in fact move through the Great Lakes, as you know—the market has different dimensions. I will begin by answering your question on which ports might benefit

December 6th, 2007Committee meeting

Emile Di Sanza

Transport committee  Some use the term “cabotage”, but it has different connotations. Let us talk instead about short sea shipping. There are people assessing the potential of the Great Lakes, where there is a huge market for container transport, for example. St. Lawrence seaway officials, together

December 6th, 2007Committee meeting

Emile Di Sanza

Transport committee  Sure, I would be quite pleased to. I guess there are a couple of elements in your question, and I'll deal with them systematically. First of all, with respect to access to contribution funding for these capital projects—and we have singled out specific areas, no doubt—we would

December 6th, 2007Committee meeting

Emile Di Sanza

Transport committee  Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Good morning, honourable members of the committee. I'm very pleased to make a presentation to this committee on the proposed amendments to the Canada Marine Act as contained in Bill C-23. This suite of amendments recognizes the underlying impo

December 6th, 2007Committee meeting

Emile Di Sanza