Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Public Safety committee That's a good question. The funding we're receiving in the supplementary (C)s is really to assist us with the web portal that the Correctional Service of Canada is going to be providing us. With that, we'll be able to provide victims with an electronic means to register and to
March 8th, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee Well, we'd have to see what the legislation brings forward before we could actually make a determination on how that might impact us. First of all, there are no pardons. They're record suspensions. If the term is going to be changed, then the legislation would have to be change
March 8th, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee I just have—
March 8th, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee It has to be a written request.
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee Yes, but that—
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee That's true.
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee That's a good question.
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee A legislative change would be required to open up the decision registry.
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee There has to be a request, because there is a security clearance check that has to be done for individuals entering into an institution.
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee As board members assess the risk of an offender, they first look at the charges that the offender was convicted of. They look at any prior criminal history that he may have, as well as any relevant societal issues, such as being a victim himself in his own childhood, victimizatio
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee That would be one area that a board member would take into account. However, they're going to look at all of the factors. It's not just one factor that will decide whether this individual is going to be released on parole or not. There are a number of factors that are looked into
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee In relation to the indigenous file or indigenous offenders, we have found that the elder-assisted hearings we have, or the community-assisted hearings that are done as well on occasion, appear to be very successful for both the offender and for the offender going back into the co
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee Again, I think it's partly education and the fact that all lifers—and I won't speak about one particular individual—have their first opportunity for a parole hearing at 22 years, three years prior to their 25 years. They will always be on parole. Lifers will never be released bac
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko
Public Safety committee In relation to the Parole Board, when we came to the board in 2009, the biggest issue we had was education. I'm from western Canada. I grew up close to a first nations community, so my background and my knowledge is there, but many Canadians have never been involved with or live
February 23rd, 2016Committee meeting
Harvey Cenaiko