Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-72 of 72
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  I'm Glenn Gilmour, legal counsel with the criminal law policy section of the Department of Justice. I work with Mr. Breithaupt. The terms “promotion” and “advocating” are terms that have been judicially interpreted by the Supreme Court of Canada. Promoting was examined by the Su

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Public Safety committee  I'll just say that, with the proposed amendment, what we're trying to do is deal with the problem of the potential overlap that had been mentioned in order to ensure that an appropriate punishment can be put on someone who counsels the commission of a specific terrorism offence,

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Public Safety committee  This one, yes.

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Public Safety committee  For counselling you're trying to counsel someone to commit an offence. The idea is that there would be a person who you're trying to effect, but it doesn't have to have an effect on that person. For example, if I were to counsel you to commit an offence and you're an undercover p

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Public Safety committee  My understanding is that you don't have to know specifically who it is you're contacting. You don't have to know the identity of the person who you're contacting. You can counsel generally to a group of people. One particular example in that regard might be.... You may recall the

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Public Safety committee  I'm somewhat reluctant to give a legal opinion on that type of issue.

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Public Safety committee  I would answer that simply by saying I think what has been proposed would help strengthen the ability and not weaken it. It would strengthen counselling, let's put it that way. It would strengthen the ability to use counselling.

April 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Justice committee  Thank you.

May 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Justice committee  I'm afraid I'd have to speculate on why it's not being used. It may be, perhaps, as was mentioned, that lack of resources might be an issue. It has been mentioned that section 320.1.... Maybe I'll just set out the parameters of it. Section 320.1 is a specific provision in the C

May 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Justice committee  It's an in rem procedure. No one need be charged with the crime. There's also section 320, which was originally put in the Criminal Code when the offences were created back in 1970—a different time, of course—which allowed for a judge to order the seizure and forfeiture of hate p

May 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Citizenship and Immigration committee  You can renew the initial time frame for each authorization. It's a maximum of five years, but it can be renewed.

March 29th, 2023Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour

Justice committee  To add to what my colleague said—and, in fact, what my boss said—section 83.08 essentially freezes property owned or controlled by a terrorist group. It makes it essentially a crime for someone to deal in property that's owned or controlled by a terrorist group. Section 83.09 all

April 17th, 2023Committee meeting

Glenn Gilmour