Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-105 of 110
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Official Languages committee  The employer could impose a penalty. However, the Conflict of Interest Act does not provide for a substantive penalty.

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  In the beginning, when I took office and the penalties began, more people did not comply with the primary deadlines, namely the obligation to file their confidential report within 60 days. We had to do a lot of work to inform reporting public office holders of this compliance req

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  I don't know whether it's due simply to the penalty or the fact that the penalty is then made public. Many people say that they'll pay the penalty, but they wonder whether it's really necessary for it to be made public. However, the act provides that penalties must be made public

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  For my part, I don't think so. We've implemented measures that allow us to monitor continually. However, we don't represent the private sector. We're limited to reporting public office holders. Section 19 of the Conflict of Interest Act states that compliance with the act is a c

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  Thank you. For us, the real purpose of penalties assessed against reporting public office holders is to encourage compliance. Penalties are certainly a measure that the commissioner can use, but she genuinely believes in public transparency. In her opinion, a public report is th

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  For us, it's really a matter of violations of deadlines. That's really administrative. The penalties are not related to substantive violations. For example, if someone breaks the rules by taking part in a discussion and putting themselves in a conflict of interest situation, we d

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  I will let you answer because the act only applies to reporting public office holders, so they're not private companies.

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Official Languages committee  Mr. Chair and honourable members of the committee, I am pleased to appear before you today on behalf of Mary Dawson, the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, who regrets that she is unable to be here herself. I am joined by my colleague Peggy Koulaib, chief of procedures

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Information & Ethics committee  There used to be three term positions in the advisory and compliance division, but the people left and the positions became vacant. Employees have since been appointed to these positions. Managing a large workload is always a challenge for a small organization. We hope the plan

May 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It's important to review the documentation that comes with it. If there's a cover letter that asks for support on a bill or something like that, that is an indication the gift is most likely not acceptable.

February 18th, 2016Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Essentially, if there is a bill before the House or changes in legislation or if somebody is appearing in front of committee to make changes to legislation or a project bill, at that point in time we would determine that the organization could not provide you with a gift.

February 18th, 2016Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Exactly. Going back to the insurance brokers' association, a few years back members had come to us and asked, “Can we accept this gift?” because they all had received blankets or.... Actually it wasn't that case, it was that they were doing promotions—

February 18th, 2016Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Procedure and House Affairs committee  At that point we said they couldn't, the reason being that there was a piece of legislation they were pushing in the House in committee. We had said at that point that members sitting on that committee should not be accepting those gifts from the insurance brokers.

February 18th, 2016Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Again, if you're not sitting around the table, if you're not in the committee, that would—

February 18th, 2016Committee meeting

Lyne Robinson-Dalpé