Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, if I may, the amendments by the Green Party are deemed moved, so nobody needs to be here to move them.

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, it's the legislative clerk here.

Canadian Heritage committee  Since G-4 was adopted, there is a line conflict between BQ-6 and CPC-26.

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, I'm sorry to interrupt. My apologies, but I've missed a page.

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes.

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. No, there is not, because you're adding it after line 36. You can always add several.... It will be renumbered, if needed, at the reprint.

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair.

Canadian Heritage committee  I'm not sure there was an answer to the question of whether you shall report the bill, as amended, to the House.

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm going to try to explain what the government amendment and the NDP amendment do at the same time. I would propose different writing for those, so that it reads like this, since it's a subamendment. It is that the amendment be amended by, (a) adding on

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Madame Pauzé had proposed an amendment earlier on page 15, line 29, that replaced the words, in English, “may specify” with the word “specifies”. That was right in the middle of the amendment that was proposed by the government, so it would preclude the ame

Environment committee  They are, unless you want them removed.

Environment committee  I'm not sure because the amendment proposed by the government doesn't address what's in the amendment. It looks more like an amendment rather than a subamendment. It would probably be easier to deal with amendment, NDP-18, first. If you wanted to propose your new amendment, as I

Environment committee  No, we don't know where you are.

Public Safety committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. As you will recall, yesterday the committee adopted a subamendment to NDP-1, the protection order. There was a new definition. In French, in the definition of protection order, "S'entend une ordonnance rendue" should read "S'entend d'une ordonnance rendue.

Public Safety committee  Mr. Chair, the change is only in the English version. Of course, on the French side you'll have the new English version. It says both “if the justice is satisfied” and “where the justice is satisfied”, so at reprint there will be a problem. We won't know which one to put there.