Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 47
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

National Defence committee  Perfect. I'm going to read the whole motion, with the amendments that have been suggested by Madam Mathyssen. The motion would read: That the committee extends the transparency within the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces study by two additional meet

February 26th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  We don't know yet, because of the complicated process for when they're deemed to be reported back. It's three sitting days before the end of the supply period, which is the 26th—the following Tuesday—or three days before the last allotted day, which hasn't been allotted yet. We

February 26th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

National Defence committee  It's adding two additional hours to the study.

February 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  No later than Monday would be great.

February 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  The original motion was for a minimum of four meetings, which we have hit. As far as our witness list is concerned, the military family resource centre was invited and declined the invitation. I could reach out to them for another meeting. That was more or less everyone who was p

February 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  Absolutely. Unfortunately, I have only the English version. The amendment would add at the end of the motion, after “to the Armed Forces of Ukraine”, “provided that they are safe for transport and are operationally effective”. (Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

February 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  The amendment as amended reads as follows: “Given that, rent for Canadian military personnel living on base is increasing this April, and at a time when the military is struggling to recruit and retain personnel, the committee report to the House, that the government immediately

February 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  Madame Normandin is right that, on the section that makes reference to removing Standing Order 109, you can't.... You can just vote against it. The first part amends the amendment, so that should be fine.

February 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

National Defence committee  Mr. Olmsted, at the bottom of your screen, there's an option to pick the language. It is a globe icon that says “Interpretation”. You just have to make sure that you're listening on the English channel. That will give you the English interpretation.

January 31st, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

National Defence committee  Is it working now, Mr. Olmsted? Can you hear me in English?

January 31st, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

January 29th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

National Defence committee  I'm sorry. Are you moving to adjourn debate on the motion, or are you moving to adjourn the meeting?

September 28th, 2023Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

National Defence committee  They're both dilatory motions. I'm just not sure which one you're moving.

September 28th, 2023Committee meeting

The Clerk

National Defence committee  You're going to suspend.

June 9th, 2023Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

National Defence committee  For the benefit of the colleagues online, which is why I thought we had to adjourn, you have to leave the meeting. In your memo, there is a second set of instructions as to how to sign in. The sooner you do that, the sooner we can get on with the in camera portion of our meeting.

June 9th, 2023Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee