Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 60
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources committee  Do you mean the first “shall”?

December 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Natural Resources committee  Just to be sure, for the report, it would be: financial security requirements and nuclear liability limits in other countries and under international agreements respecting nuclear liability; and

December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Canadian Heritage committee  Well, similar provisions.

December 1st, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  If more people participate in the program, and there are higher expenditures as a result of that, those would be the operating expenditures of the program. But nothing in that changes the manner or the rules, the framework in which the program functions. And that's what's covered

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  It's the operation of the program. That's what the program is designed to do.

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  As I said before, the premium rate is not covered by the royal recommendation because it's not expenditure, it's income. The fact that this may be a--

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  The royal recommendation deals with government expenditure and the terms and conditions of the expenditure. This deals with the premium rate, which is not expenditure, it's income. It's the money that comes into the fund, not the money that goes out, and so it's not covered by th

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  It does not change or relax the terms of the royal recommendation with respect to the expenditure in the bill, and the royal recommendation only deals with expenditure. It doesn't deal with all of the terms and conditions of the bill, but only those terms and conditions that rela

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  There is no additional expenditure from the consolidated revenue fund as a result of this amendment. There may be an accounting change inside the consolidated revenue fund, but no one is eligible for any additional benefit in any way that is different from that already provided f

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Human Resources committee  It does not have an impact on the royal recommendation, because the royal recommendation does not deal with the income. It only deals with the expenditure.

November 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Industry committee  It says: (c) replacing line 13 on page 48 with the following: (3) Paragraphs 7(1)(a), (c) and (d) and (2)(a) to (c.1) and the exception set out in

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Industry committee  We will number them if they're adopted.

October 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  Could we ask the officials if the word “and” is necessary at the end of the amendment?

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  Yes, it's amendment G-11, page 40.

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  I'm sorry, we have a little bit of confusion here. G-8 is an amendment to clause 85. G-8 has been adopted, so the committee should vote on clause 85. G-8.1 is the addition of a new clause 85.1. So we need to finish—

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Wayne Cole