Evidence of meeting #112 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cbsa.
A video is available from Parliament.
2:15 p.m.
Liberal
Charles Sousa Liberal Mississauga—Lakeshore, ON
Yes.
Unless somebody has some.... I think we just need a little time to finalize the amendment, Mr. Chair.
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley
It's April 19 and eliminating (c). Is that correct, Mr. Sousa?
2:15 p.m.
Liberal
Charles Sousa Liberal Mississauga—Lakeshore, ON
I'll read it to you, as it's just been obtained.
It reads, “That the Committee direct the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) to present, no later than April 19th, 2024: (a) all Botler AI communication with Erin O’Gorman and other employees of the CBSA; (b) the misconduct report received by Botler AI in the fall of 2022, and (c) any and all evidence pertaining to the deleted and/or missing CBSA emails attributed to Minh Doan.”
If it's being suggested that we delete item (c) from the amendment, I'm okay with that as well.
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley
Why don't we make that part of your amendment, then? We'll change the date to “April 19th” and just eliminate item (c).
Is that fair, Mr. Sousa?
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley
We're on Mr. Sousa's amendment.
I see Mr. Kusmierczyk on the amendment.
2:15 p.m.
Liberal
Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor—Tecumseh, ON
Yes. I just want to clarify that it's “present to committee”.
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley
Can we get UC on Mr. Sousa's amendment, which is changing “April 2nd” to “April 19th”—we'll say “at noon”, if that's okay, because we need a time—and then eliminating item (c)?
2:15 p.m.
Liberal
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley
Yes. My computer just crashed. Sure.
I'm sensing a thumbs up all around for Mr. Sousa's amendment.
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
We're back on the amended motion.
Does anyone wish to speak, or can I safely assume we're all in agreement with the motion? Do we need to have it read back to be on the safe side, or are we fine?
(Motion as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Wonderful. Thanks very much, everyone.
If there's nothing else, colleagues, we are adjourned.