Okay. You would think the Supreme Court would want to tighten it as much as possible, but they said, “We see no reason to interfere with that choice.”
Anyway, I'm not going to belabour the point.
Those are the only questions I have.
On March 4th, 2013. See this statement in context.
March 4th, 2013 / 4 p.m.
Liberal
Francis Scarpaleggia Liberal Lac-Saint-Louis, QC
Okay. You would think the Supreme Court would want to tighten it as much as possible, but they said, “We see no reason to interfere with that choice.”
Anyway, I'm not going to belabour the point.
Those are the only questions I have.
See context to find out what was said next.