No, but as you know, the Access to Information Act has been around for a long time. When people ask us for information on a company, under section 20 we have to consult that company. If the matter involves financial information or proprietary information, it is protected. This is information which the minister would not disclose.
In the case of Jetsgo, for example, the bad financial situation of the company was revealed at the same time as the company ceased its operations. It was not the minister's responsibility to disclose the privileged information. We had information concerning security, so we did something about it. We did everything we could in that area. We were not shy about doing what we had to do and about justifying what we had done given the information we had.