So to be clear then, you were not saying that the 21:1 ratio was a savings issue. You were talking about the cost-benefit.
On April 24th, 2012. See this statement in context.
On April 24th, 2012. See this statement in context.
April 24th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.
Conservative
Ed Holder Conservative London West, ON
So to be clear then, you were not saying that the 21:1 ratio was a savings issue. You were talking about the cost-benefit.
See context to find out what was said next.