Debates of Dec. 7th, 1998
House of Commons Hansard #167 of the 36th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was trade.
Topics
- Motion No. 300
- Criminal Code
- Appointment Of Commissioner Of Official Languages
- Special Import Measures Act
- Insurance Companies Act
- Corruption Of Foreign Public Officials Act
- Professor Mohamed Elmasry
- Inquiries
- Opera Ontario
- Natural Disasters
- Monique Sioui
- National Friendship Centres
- Violence Against Women
- Maria Mach
- The Late Alphonse Piché
- Reform Party
- Agriculture
- Bernard Lord
- Boys And Girls Club Of Ontario
- Gun Control
- Apec Inquiry
- Taxation
- Prebudget Consultations
- Taxation
- Professional Sport
- Agriculture
- Business Development Bank Of Canada
- Steel Industry
- Agriculture
- Poverty
- Agriculture
- 1999 Francophone Summit
- Fisheries
- Canadian Human Rights Act
- Government Expenditures
- Parliament Hill
- Western Economic Diversification
- Fisheries
- Parliament Buildings Renovations
- Employment Insurance
- Privilege
- Points Of Order
- Government Response To Petitions
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Citizenship Of Canada Act
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Points Of Order
- Corruption Of Foreign Public Officials Act
- Agriculture
- Corruption Of Foreign Public Officials Act
- Canada Customs And Revenue Agency Act
- Division No. 299
- Division No. 300
- Division No. 301
- Division No. 302
- Division No. 303
- Division No. 304
- National Defence Act
- Division No. 305
- Railway Safety Act
- Division No. 306
- Division No. 307
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare Motions Nos. 107 and 101 defeated.
We skipped one motion. The question is on Motion No. 103. My clerks tell me we did not do it. Therefore we will do it.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, respectfully I think you would find that you yourself ruled on Motion No. 101 in the application of the votes on Motion No. 103.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
The Speaker
Before I deal with your point of order, with double respect, according to the information I have in front of me it seems that Motions Nos. 101 and 103 do not coincide.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
If the Speaker wants to call the question on Motion No. 103, we are prepared to move accordingly.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
The Speaker
We are dealing with Motion No. 103.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Reform
Chuck Strahl Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present still vote yes on this one.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Bloc
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
NDP
John Solomon Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, NDP members present this evening vote yes on this motion.
Division No. 302
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Progressive Conservative
André Harvey Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, members from our party vote no on this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 103, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 303
Government Orders
December 7th, 1998 / 5:40 p.m.
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 103 defeated. The next question is on the motion for concurrence.
Division No. 303
Government Orders
5:40 p.m.
Vancouver South—Burnaby
B.C.
Liberal
Division No. 303
Government Orders
5:45 p.m.
Liberal
Bob Kilger Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you will find unanimous consent that those members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House. Liberal members will vote yes.