Debates of Nov. 26th, 1999
House of Commons Hansard #29 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was tourism.
Topics
- Canadian Tourism Commission Act
- Crime Prevention
- Immigration
- Tobacco
- Child Poverty
- Science And Engineering
- Rights Of Youth
- Government Of Ontario
- Chechnya
- Regional Development
- Hockey
- Liberal Party Of Canada
- The Late Doug Sahm
- Democracy
- Football
- Public Works
- Canada Post
- Canada Elections Act
- Employment
- Hockey
- National Unity
- Referendums
- Sudan
- Banking
- Referendums
- Taxation
- National Defence
- Taxation
- Trade
- Poverty
- Social Housing
- Agriculture
- Trade
- Regional Economic Development
- Mining Industry
- Rcmp
- Gun Control
- Housing
- Fisheries
- Health
- Tobacco
- Genetically Modified Foods
- Child Poverty
- Fisheries
- Rural Development
- Airport Safety
- Treaties Ratified In 1991 And 1992
- Technology Partnerships Canada
- Government Response To Petitions
- Committees Of The House
- Criminal Code
- Canadian Forces Superannuation Act
- Competition Act
- Maximum Speed Control Device Act
- Wages Liability Act
- Privacy Act
- Land Titles Act
- Pension Fund Societies Act
- Insurance Companies Act
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act
- Indian Act
- Hazardous Products Act
- Government Employees Compensation Act
- Extradition Act
- Interpretation Act
- Canadian Child Rights Act
- Territorial Lands Act
- Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act
- Criminal Code
- Canada Transportation Act
- Divorce Act
- Excise Tax Act
- Excise Act
- Corrections And Conditional Release Act
- Canada-United Kingdom Civil And Commercial Judgments Convention Act
- Canada Co-Operative Associations Act
- Canada Student Loans Act
- Canada Shipping Act
- Canada Health Act
- Departmental Internal Audit Act
- Canada Pension Plan
- Divorce Act
- Canada Business Corporations Act
- Bills Of Exchange Act
- Canadian Bill Of Rights
- National Standards For Education Act
- National Literacy Standards Act
- Canadian Bill Of Rights
- Immigration Act
- Committees Of The House
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Canadian Tourism Commission Act
- Witness Protection Program Act
Genetically Modified Foods
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Bloc
Monique Guay Laurentides, QC
Mr. Speaker, following the lead of Japan and Europe, last week 19 representatives in the U.S. congress tabled a bill to make it mandatory in the United States to label genetically modified foods or foods containing genetically modified organisms.
My question is for the Minister of Agriculture. Does he realize that Canada may soon be one of the few countries where it is not mandatory to label genetically modified food and that our farm products may well be rejected just about everywhere, including in the United States?
Genetically Modified Foods
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Parry Sound—Muskoka
Ontario
Liberal
Andy Mitchell Secretary of State (Rural Development)(Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario)
Mr. Speaker, this is a very important issue. It is one that both the Minister of Health and the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food have been spending a great deal of time working on. It is important that we consult with Canadians. The ministers are undertaking consultations with Canadians and they will deal with this issue in due course.
Child Poverty
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
NDP
Michelle Dockrill Bras D'Or, NS
Mr. Speaker, we have heard promise after promise from the government about what it will do to help Canadian children, but no action.
Ninety per cent of single mothers and their children live in poverty. One in four children in Nova Scotia experience poverty. Cape Breton children are worse off than their neighbours in the rest of the province. These statistics do not need reviewing. They are cold hard facts, especially cold and hard for the children they represent.
What specific targets is the Minister of Finance willing to set to eliminate child poverty, given that the efforts of the government to date have failed Canadian children?
Child Poverty
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Victoria
B.C.
Liberal
David Anderson Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member fails to point out that the unemployment rate for adult women is at its lowest rate in 25 years. It is now at 5.8%. Since we were elected in 1993 there have been more than 800,000 jobs created for women.
Women's employment has grown faster than men's in each of the last four decades. In fact, we have had the highest growth of any of the G-7 nations in the last 20 years.
I point out to the hon. member that we are trying to deal with the causes of child poverty, the causes of women in disadvantaged conditions by making—
Child Poverty
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
The Deputy Speaker
The hon. member for West Nova.
Fisheries
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Progressive Conservative
Mark Muise West Nova, NS
Mr. Speaker, on January 18 the former minister of fisheries wrote to one of our fishery representatives telling him that there would be no increase in lobster size until the industry's self-imposed V-notching program could be analysed.
Why did the minister not give V-notching a chance?
Fisheries
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Vancouver South—Burnaby
B.C.
Liberal
Herb Dhaliwal Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
Mr. Speaker, as I responded to a question earlier, carapace size is about conservation. By increasing the carapace size by 1/16 of an inch, we will protect the resource and make sure we have a sustainable lobster fishery. We will ensure that we protect the resource, unlike the member and his party. At one time they speak about conservation and the next time they are not interested in speaking about conservation. They are speaking from both sides of their mouth. Why do they not become consistent?
Rural Development
Oral Question Period
Noon
Liberal
Ivan Grose Oshawa, ON
Mr. Speaker, I rise today with a rural question, although the closest thing to a farm in my riding is the vegetable garden in my backyard. I had a good crop this year. No need for assistance.
My people in Oshawa make the best cars and trucks in North America and their best customers are rural customers. What is the Secretary of State for Rural Development doing to ensure that rural Canadians are playing an active role in charting their own social and economic course?
Rural Development
Oral Question Period
Noon
Parry Sound—Muskoka
Ontario
Liberal
Andy Mitchell Secretary of State (Rural Development)(Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario)
Mr. Speaker, it is absolutely essential that government undertake policies and measures in a way that makes sense for rural Canadians.
We believe it is important to give rural Canadians themselves the tools they need to make the decisions that work best for their particular communities. That is why we undertook a very extensive rural dialogue with rural Canadians, speaking to over 7,000 of them, ending with a conference in Belleville earlier this year.
I am pleased to advise the House today that we will have a follow-up to that conference in Magog, Quebec on April 28, 29 and 30.
Airport Safety
Oral Question Period
Noon
Reform
Val Meredith South Surrey—White Rock—Langley, BC
Mr. Speaker, when the government was transferring ownership of regional airports to the local municipalities, it relaxed the emergency response time so as not to impose excessive burdens on these local communities.
Now that the government has divested these airports, it is tightening up the rules again, requiring local communities to provide a three minute response time. This is a move that will cost dozens of communities millions of dollars each.
Why did the government entice the municipalities with relaxed requirements only to tighten up the requirements after the local governments acquired the airports?
Airport Safety
Oral Question Period
Noon
Thunder Bay—Atikokan
Ontario
Liberal
Stan Dromisky Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, as we all know, safety is the top priority of the government, especially in the area of transportation. We are quite aware of the situation that is taking place. We will monitor and review every move that is made by all the agencies and the authorities regarding this question of safety.
Treaties Ratified In 1991 And 1992
Routine Proceedings
November 26th, 1999 / noon
Brome—Missisquoi
Québec
Liberal
Denis Paradis Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Foreign Affairs
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to table in both official languages, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), 27 treaties that came into effect in 1992 and 58 treaties that came into effect in 1991. We are also tabling the list of these treaties.
As was done previously, I am also providing CD-ROMs to the Library of Parliament, which contain electronic versions of these treaties, in order to provide wide accessibility to those texts.
Technology Partnerships Canada
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Scarborough Centre
Ontario
Liberal
John Cannis Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Industry
Mr. Speaker, in accordance with Standing Order 32(2), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the Technology Partnerships Canada annual report for the years 1998 and 1999.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Scarborough—Rouge River
Ontario
Liberal
Derek Lee Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to four petitions.
Committees Of The House
Routine Proceedings
12:05 p.m.
Liberal
Sue Barnes London West, ON
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour of tabling, in both official languages, the first report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development.
Pursuant to order of reference of Monday, November 1, 1999, your committee has studied Bill C-9, an act to give effect to the Nisga'a final agreement, and has agreed to report it without amendment.
