Debates of Sept. 30th, 2005
House of Commons Hansard #129 of the 38th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was harassment.
Topics
- Committees of the House
- Remote Sensing Space Systems Act
- Seniors
- Lake Simcoe
- Fafia
- Liberal Government
- Swansea
- Search and Rescue
- Iran
- Trois-Rivières
- Carnegie Gallery
- Canadian Tourism Commission
- Justice
- Seniors
- Drinking Water
- Biennale du lin de Portneuf
- Public Funds
- Firefighters
- Sisters in Spirit Campaign
- Softwood Lumber
- David Dingwall
- Sponsorship Program
- National Defence
- Housing
- Technology Partnerships Canada
- National Defence
- David Dingwall
- Public Works and Government Services
- Public Service
- Emergency Preparedness
- Border Security
- Immigration
- Chief Electoral Officer
- Health
- Poverty
- National Defence
- Energy Prices
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Status of Women
- Finance
- Agriculture
- Social Development
- Taxation
- Copyright Act
- Highway Infrastructure
- Economic Development
- House of Commons Calender
- Certificates of Nomination
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Remote Sensing Space Systems Act
- Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act
Taxation
Oral Question Period
September 30th, 2005 / 11:55 a.m.
Conservative
Gary Goodyear Cambridge, ON
Mr. Speaker, school boards in Quebec and Ontario, including one that covers my riding of Cambridge, took the Liberal government to court to prove that they should be exempt from GST and the cost of transporting our children. The courts agreed and a final settlement was reached, but then the Minister of Finance retroactively changed the law, and now refuses to respect the courts.
When will the minister stop manipulating the law to suit government greed and start putting children ahead of surpluses?
Taxation
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Wascana
Saskatchewan
Liberal
Ralph Goodale Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, we always try to make the tax rules of our country as fair and equitable as they can possibly be. I can assure the hon. gentleman that the well-being of children, preschool, in school and through post-secondary education, is a very high priority in which the government invests billions every year, paid for by the tax revenue that is raised from all our various sources.
Copyright Act
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Conservative
Joy Smith Kildonan—St. Paul, MB
Mr. Speaker, the education of the students in my riding of Kildonan--St. Paul and across Canada is at risk in this new school year because the government has avoided putting an educational amendment into the copyright law, Bill C-60. Schools cannot afford this added cost of paying for otherwise free materials from the Internet.
Will the government support an amendment to the legislation?
Copyright Act
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Jeanne-Le Ber
Québec
Liberal
Liza Frulla Minister of Canadian Heritage and Minister responsible for Status of Women
Mr. Speaker, on June 20, we introduced Bill C-60 to amend the Copyright Act as promised. The bill will help clarify the scope of copyright, and it makes it possible for Canada to join other countries.
We are taking this issue very seriously. We want to have material available to students, but we also want to protect the rights of those who are giving that material. We are taking this issue and putting it aside because it needs some discussion and clarification.
Highway Infrastructure
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Bloc
Robert Bouchard Chicoutimi—Le Fjord, QC
Mr. Speaker, the federal government has made a commitment, with the Government of Quebec, to assume half the costs of widening highway 175. When the Minister of Transport was in the region this past August, he said that the additional costs would come from a number of federal programs. Now that same Minister of Transport is reneging on his commitment and refusing to assume 50% of the total costs of widening highway 175.
Does the minister intend to honour his commitment and recognize the 50-50 principle as stated?
Highway Infrastructure
Oral Question Period
Noon
Outremont
Québec
Liberal
Jean Lapierre Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, if the hon. member took the time to read the agreement signed by the Prime Minister and the premier on May 7, 2004, he would know that Canada and Quebec agree that their respective contributions to the project would be 50% of eligible costs, up to a maximum of $262.5 million each, for phase one of the project. That is exactly what was in the agreement signed by the two of them.
For subsequent phases, we are going to negotiate with the Quebec minister of transport. Within a subsequent phase of the infrastructure program, we will—
Highway Infrastructure
Oral Question Period
Noon
The Deputy Speaker
The hon. member for Lac-Saint-Louis.
Economic Development
Oral Question Period
Noon
Liberal
Francis Scarpaleggia Lac-Saint-Louis, QC
Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada.
The Sayabec community in the Lower St. Lawrence is reeling from the announced restructuring of the Uniboard plant and the loss of 200 jobs.
What does the Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada intend to do to help this region?
Economic Development
Oral Question Period
Noon
Brossard—La Prairie
Québec
Liberal
Jacques Saada Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec and Minister responsible for the Francophonie
Mr. Speaker, the Uniboard plant did in fact announce the loss of 214 jobs in that region. This is very significant and most regrettable.
This is a problem that goes beyond just lumber. It is an industrial problem. The company produces particleboard for building furniture. The Chinese competition has affected this entire market.
My offices are already active on two fronts. First, in the short term, we are supporting local employees by trying to place them in other companies in the region. Our second plan of attack is much broader. It consists in trying to see whether we could support a regional and trans-regional initiative for producing other products with these same resources.
House of Commons Calender
Oral Question Period
Noon
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Marcel Proulx)
Pursuant to Standing Order 28(2)( b ), I have the honour to lay upon the table the House of Commons calendar for the year 2006.
Certificates of Nomination
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Beauséjour
New Brunswick
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to table two certificates of nomination.
I am sure the first one should bring joy and happiness to all members of the House. Under Standing Order 111.1(1), I am tabling today a certificate of nomination of Audrey Elizabeth O'Brien to be Clerk of the House of Commons.
Certificates of Nomination
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Some hon. members
Hear, hear!
Certificates of Nomination
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Beauséjour, NB
Mr. Speaker, with the reaction of members in the House perhaps we could proceed immediately to a motion to approve the nomination instead of it going to a committee, but we will leave that for another day.
I am also tabling a certificate of nomination with respect to a position on the Canadian Dairy Commission. This will be referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
Petitions
Routine Proceedings
12:05 p.m.
Liberal
Sarmite Bulte Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, on behalf of my constituents, I am pleased to table a petition in the House which draws the attention of the House to the fact that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has locked out 5,500 of its employees since August 15.
The petition calls upon the government to take immediate action to end this lockout. I respectfully ask that the government do so as quickly as possible.
Petitions
Routine Proceedings
12:05 p.m.
NDP
Tony Martin Sault Ste. Marie, ON
Mr. Speaker, I wish to present a petition on behalf of my constituents.
The petitioners draw the attention of the House to the fact that the community access program, CAP, is in the last year of its existence. The CAP initiative has greatly increased the number of Canadians able to take advantage of the social and economic benefits of computers and the Internet. The absence of CAP will be a step backwards in the Canadian government's ongoing goal to improve the quality of life for Canadian citizens and will contribute to increasing the current digital divide in many Canadian communities.
Therefore the petitioners request that Parliament refrain from ending the community access program.
