Debates of Oct. 23rd, 2007
House of Commons Hansard #6 of the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was speech.
Topics
- Question Period
- James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement and Northeastern Quebec Agreement
- Canada Elections Act
- National Defence Act
- Excise Tax Act
- Canada's Clean Air and Climate Change Act
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Point of Order
- Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply
- Young Leaders in Rural Canada Awards
- Eunice Grayson
- MusiCan Award
- Lord Selkirk Boy Scout Pipe Band
- Canadian Fertilizer Institute
- York Regional Police
- Agriculture
- Forestry Industry
- A Capital Experience
- Knights of Columbus
- Speech from the Throne
- Corporate Tax Cuts
- Fisheries and Oceans
- Louise Robert Beaudin and Marie-Josée Cloutier
- Manufacturing Sector
- Infrastructure
- Elections Canada
- Charter of the French Language
- Budget Statement
- Government Appointments
- Status of Women
- International Trade
- Manufacturing Industry
- Afghanistan
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Anti-terrorism Act
- Security Certificates
- Canada Elections Act
- Lumber Industry
- Human Resources
- Employment Insurance
- Air Transportation
- Fishing Industry
- Automobile Industry
- Canadian Wheat Board
- International Trade
- Guaranteed Income Supplement
- Summer Career Placement Program
- Border Security
- Board of Internal Economy
- Privilege
- Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply
- Old Age Security Act
International Trade
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Bloc
Serge Cardin Sherbrooke, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of International Trade is currently negotiating free trade agreements with 28 countries. Canada has a trade deficit with these countries, in particular with South Korea.
How can the minister rush into signing a free trade agreement while ignoring the study released by the CAW this morning, which shows that more than 30,000 jobs could be lost in Canada, including 8,000 in Quebec? Should saving these jobs not be a major concern for the minister?
International Trade
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Vancouver Kingsway
B.C.
Conservative
David Emerson Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics
Mr. Speaker, the government is fully committed to free and open markets and to providing Canadian companies with access to foreign markets. Without free trade, the Canadian economy would be in much tougher shape than it is today.
Yes, we are negotiating with Korea. No, we do not have a free trade agreement yet with Korea. I can assure the hon. member that the government would not enter into a free trade agreement with Korea or any other country unless there were substantial benefits to Canada.
Manufacturing Industry
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Bloc
Paule Brunelle Trois-Rivières, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Governor of the Bank of Canada said that the Canadian dollar's climb is unjustified. He merely said what everyone knows: while Alberta is enjoying the oil and gas boom, the manufacturing industry in Quebec and Ontario is struggling.
Of the 22 recommendations made by the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, the government has implemented only one of them, and only partially.
What is the minister waiting for to introduce refundable tax credits and loan guarantees, and to make significant federal investments in research and development? These are all measures that could help the manufacturing industry in a concrete way.
Manufacturing Industry
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Whitby—Oshawa
Ontario
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, there is no question about it. The Canadian dollar is showing strength, in part reflecting the great strength of the Canadian economy. After 21 months of Conservative government, we have a very strong economy.
We have the lowest unemployment rate in 33 years. We have the largest number of Canadians in the history of Canada working in Canada, both men and women. It is a strong economy.
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
October 23rd, 2007 / 2:35 p.m.
Liberal
Denis Coderre Bourassa, QC
Mr. Speaker, it is another day and another crisis of accountability for the ethically challenged government. Private U.S. security firms operating in combat zones have raised some very serious questions about whether or not NATO countries can be held accountable by local authorities if laws are broken.
The government has signed a contract to pay Saladin Security in Afghanistan, but Canadians have no way of knowing who will be held responsible if something goes wrong. Why? Because the contract is being kept secret. When will the government stop its pattern of secrecy and table the contract?
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence and Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
First, Mr. Speaker, clearly it is not a secret. The hon. member read about it in the paper today, so it is not a secret.
As we have seen on a number of other occasions, private security firms have been used from time to time depending on the issue and on the type of training required. That is standard practice. It has happened under the previous government.
We are very judicious when we enter into these contracts.
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Liberal
Denis Coderre Bourassa, QC
Mr. Speaker, this government is prepared to commit our soldiers to combat missions until 2011, but it has to hire a mercenary company to protect our embassy in Kabul.
One might wonder why the Conservative government is associated with Saladin Security, a company of mercenaries specifically known for certain clandestine operations. This is not clear.
Why are the Conservatives interested in hiring mercenaries? Why can our soldiers not protect our embassy and its staff?
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Beauce
Québec
Conservative
Maxime Bernier Minister of Foreign Affairs
Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague is alleging facts that are simply not true.
The reality is this: we have a contract system and we use it. We have followed all the procedures. We are following the same procedures in all embassies, both in that country and around the world.
The hon. member for Bourassa is trying to distort reality. But the reality is simple: our government has standards and procedures that it follows for all embassies in all countries.
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Liberal
Anita Neville Winnipeg South Centre, MB
Mr. Speaker, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said the government's position against the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous people is incomprehensible and an astonishing reversal of Liberal efforts to support the declaration.
Like an astrologer, the Prime Minister claims to be guided by the North Star. Will he admit that on this issue he is indeed like the North Star: cold, unmovable, distant and not too bright?
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon
B.C.
Conservative
Chuck Strahl Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians
Mr. Speaker, we know exactly what that member thinks about human rights for first nations.
After 30 years of waiting for first nations to have human rights like anyone else, like the hon. member has, do we know what she said in committee when the Liberals delayed this bill in the last Parliament? She said that they have “waited 30 years, what difference does a number of months more make...”, six months, ten months, a year, I do not see what the difference is.
The difference is that it is time first nations had human rights on reserve and we are going to deliver that to them.
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Anita Neville Winnipeg South Centre, MB
Mr. Speaker, according to the Assembly of First Nations, overcrowding in first nations--
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Peter Milliken
Order. The hon. member for Winnipeg South Centre has the floor. We do not want to have a yelling match. The hon. member has the floor and we will hear her question.
Aboriginal Affairs
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Anita Neville Winnipeg South Centre, MB
The apology should come from over there, Mr. Speaker.
According to the Assembly of First Nations, overcrowding in first nations homes is almost double the Canadian rate. Aboriginal peoples are living in homes without hot or even cold running water or flush toilets. Does the government not think it is a human rights issue?
The government's approach to the UN declaration is the same as its approach to housing for aboriginal Canadians. It is meanspirited. Is this what the government thinks is a shining example for the world to follow?
