Debates of April 17th, 2007
House of Commons Hansard #134 of the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was safety.
Topics
- Question Period
- Privilege
- Status of Women
- Competition Act
- Canada Evidence Act
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Railway Operations Legislation
- Railway Continuation Act, 2007
- George Mussallem
- Court Challenges Program
- Virginia Tech University
- Equal Voice
- Ukraine
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Human Rights
- Patriation of the Constitution
- Senate Appointment Consultations Legislation
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Trade
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Abitibi-Témiscamingue International Film Festival
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Member for Sherbrooke
- Women and Political Participation
- Government Programs
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Aerospace Industry
- Afghanistan
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police
- The Environment
- Natural Resources
- Afghanistan
- International Cooperation
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police
- Public Works and Government Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Quebec City's 400th Anniversary
- Paillé Review
- Fisheries
- The Environment
- Government Contracts
- Agriculture and Agri-Food
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Rimouski East Wharf
- Points of Order
- Railway continuation Act, 2007
- Railway Continuation Act, 2007
Quebec City's 400th Anniversary
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Durham
Ontario
Conservative
Bev Oda Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women
Mr. Speaker, as far as I know, no invitation has been sent by the committee to Her Majesty the Queen.
Paillé Review
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Bloc
Jean-Yves Laforest Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC
Mr. Speaker, in response to my question yesterday on the scope of the mandate given to Daniel Paillé concerning the granting of polling contracts, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services answered that the government had nothing to hide.
Are we to understand from the parliamentary secretary’s response that from now on the new mandate of the Paillé investigation will cover all polls, those of the Liberals as well as those of the Conservatives, up to and including 2007?
Paillé Review
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam
B.C.
Conservative
James Moore Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics
Mr. Speaker, the period we are talking about extends from 1990 to 2003. This is the period in which the problems identified by Sheila Fraser occurred. This is the mandate given to us by Canadians. We are keeping our promises to Canada’s taxpayers.
Fisheries
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Beauséjour, NB
Mr. Speaker, lobster fishermen in the Northumberland Strait are facing a crisis and this government is refusing to act. Landings have collapsed, costs have skyrocketed, and thousands of families are facing bankruptcy.
A licence retirement plan is the only immediate solution to avoid this disaster and give younger fishers and coastal communities a chance to survive. Fishermen also worry that the permanent access they were given to snow crab will be ripped out of their hands at a time when they need it most.
Will the minister confirm that crab sharing will remain and will he undertake an immediate lobster licence retirement plan to save these communities?
Fisheries
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
St. John's South—Mount Pearl
Newfoundland & Labrador
Conservative
Loyola Hearn Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
Mr. Speaker, the member raises a good question. We are very aware of the conditions in the Northumberland Strait. In fact, some time ago, led by the fisheries minister from Prince Edward Island, with his counterparts in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, we convened a summit in Prince Edward Island to deal with this very topic.
A number of pertinent committees were set up to look at all the aspects of the failure of the fishery in the Strait and a report on that should be in very soon.
In relation to the other issue he raises, we are also very much aware of this and in fact have asked for some advice on it. I will be letting the member know very soon--
Fisheries
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
The Environment
Oral Questions
April 17th, 2007 / 2:55 p.m.
Conservative
Jeff Watson Essex, ON
Mr. Speaker, back home in Essex the issue of clean air and cross-border pollution is very important to the quality of life of my constituents. Last week the Minister of the Environment was in Washington, D.C., to fight for better air quality between Canada and the United States.
Could the Minister of the Environment please tell this House about this important step in helping to clean our air and provide a cleaner environment across this continent?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of the Environment
What a great question, Mr. Speaker. Indeed, we are seeking to build upon the work that has been done in the past on the Canada-U.S. air quality agreement. We want to reopen the agreement and strengthen the provisions for particulate matter to help ensure that the air Canadians breathe is free from pollution, particularly particulate matter.
The Liberal Party, in committee on Bill C-30, stripped the important clean air parts of Bill C-30 and replaced them with its carbon tax, something that will do nothing for young children with asthma and the elderly who have to stay in on smog days caused by Liberal inaction.
Government Contracts
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
NDP
Penny Priddy Surrey North, BC
Mr. Speaker, every time the Conservatives talk about health, Canadians are left with more questions than answers. A lot of people are asking if the $300 million exclusive contract was awarded to Merck Frosst for the HPV vaccine because a Conservative lobbyist who used to work for the Prime Minister was on the file.
The Canadian Revenue Agency says Merck used tax havens in the Barbados to hide profits. The IRS in the United States is also investigating Merck for back taxes. Why is this government giving Merck millions of dollars and not collecting the billions owed to Canadian--
Government Contracts
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
Liberal
Government Contracts
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
Whitby—Oshawa
Ontario
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, we are very proud to take a step in the budget to support this vaccine for women and girls across Canada. It is the first vaccine that can actually prevent cancer. This is an important step forward.
I was pleased to be at the Ottawa Hospital yesterday, at the Shirley Green centre for women's health, to make the announcement. This is an important step forward. There is one vaccine available now. Another manufacturer is developing another one.
The important thing is that thousands of Canadian women and girls will not die from cancer because of this vaccine's availability.
Government Contracts
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
NDP
Penny Priddy Surrey North, BC
Mr. Speaker, a cancer vaccine is very important for women, but why in this case is the government letting big corporations out of paying their fair share? Why is the Minister of Health rewarding a company that has evaded $2 billion in Canadian taxes?
I am not sure if Conservative staffer turned pharma lobbyist Ken Boessenkool was the reason Merck got the money, but I do know that Merck owes Canadian taxpayers over $2 billion. Did the minister meet with Boessenkool? Did the minister consider the issue of the tax havens when making his decision?
Government Contracts
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
Whitby—Oshawa
Ontario
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Minister of Finance
No, Mr. Speaker, I did not meet with Mr. Boessenkool on the subject.
I can say that I met with Liz Ellwood yesterday at the hospital. She is a 24-year-old victim of the papillomavirus, HPV. She has suffered from it and she said thanks to me on behalf of the women and girls in Canada and to this government and this Prime Minister for supporting the availability of this vaccine across Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
Liberal
Gary Merasty Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, SK
Mr. Speaker, farmers in southwest Saskatchewan have been plagued by consecutive droughts and are in need of urgent relief, but they are being told they have to wait and see what happens with the implementation of the federal-provincial cost-shared disaster relief program.
These producers are in urgent need of cash. The Minister of Agriculture has the power and the money to provide emergency funding now under the Farm Income Protection Act.
What is the minister waiting for? When will he stop hiding behind his phony fight with the province? When will the minister allow his parliamentary secretary to deliver to his constituents?
Agriculture and Agri-Food
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon
B.C.
Conservative
Chuck Strahl Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
Mr. Speaker, the parliamentary secretary from Saskatchewan delivers the goods for Saskatchewan day after day and week after week, and thank goodness, because the only Liberal representative left in Saskatchewan barely understands what a farm looks like.
Let me tell the member that right now we are working on prospects for the drought area in southwestern Saskatchewan. We are working with the Saskatchewan government. I have put forward a disaster relief framework that all the provinces have now agreed to. We are working on the funding formula for that as well.
We are aware of those problems, not only in southwestern Saskatchewan, but in Peace River and in northern Ontario as well.
