Debates of May 30th, 2007
House of Commons Hansard #160 of the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was meth.
Topics
- Question Period
- Class of 1997
- Waterloo
- Speech and Hearing Awareness Month
- Manufacturing Industry
- Outstanding Citizens
- Cross Lake Army Cadet Corps
- Festival Funding
- Physical Education and Student Sports
- Scott Thorkelson
- Philippines
- The Senate
- Danny Malanchuk
- Canadian Coast Guard
- Adéodat Saint-Pierre
- M&M Meat Shops
- The Senate
- Canadian Forces
- Option Canada
- Manufacturing Industry
- Canadian Forces
- Access to Information
- Manufacturing Industry
- Corporate Takeovers
- Manufacturing Industry
- Estonia
- Manufacturing Industry
- Access to Information
- RCMP
- Festivals and Special Events
- Natural Resources
- Senate Tenure Legislation
- Health
- Afghanistan
- Manufacturing Industry
- Fisheries Act, 2007
- Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- Government Response to Petitions
- Canada Transportation Act
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Committees of the House
- Main Estimates 2007-08--Environment
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Motions for Papers
- Canada Elections Act
- Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
Access to Information
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Lucienne Robillard Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC
Mr. Speaker, first the Conservatives broke their promise to reform the Access to Information Act. Then when they tabled their discussion paper, the former information commissioner said it would make government less transparent, not more. Now, when the new commissioner calls the Prime Minister's own department, the Privy Council Office, the worst access to information offender, something is wrong.
Will the Prime Minister admit that he runs the most secretive government this country has ever seen?
Access to Information
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Niagara Falls
Ontario
Conservative
Rob Nicholson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Mr. Speaker, that is absolutely a bunch of nonsense.
My colleague, the President of the Treasury Board, introduced the Federal Accountability Act to open up access and bring back accountability.
Quite frankly, I am pleased with the report. When we look at the report we see progress that is being made, quite frankly finally progress is being made in this area, progress that was never made under the former administration.
Access to Information
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Lucienne Robillard Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Information Commissioner was quite clear in his most recent report.
He singles out the Privy Council Office, the Prime Minister's own department, as one of the government's least transparent institutions. Instead of showing leadership, the Prime Minister is setting a bad example.
It is one thing for him to want to have complete control over his cabinet and even journalists, but for him to also try to hide information from the public is unacceptable.
Why does the Prime Minister not only want to control information, but also hide it from the public?
Access to Information
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Niagara Falls
Ontario
Conservative
Rob Nicholson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Mr. Speaker, the government has been completely accountable through its legislation and through its actions.
I can tell the House who does not want to open up access and that is the Liberal Party. When we wanted to open up the Wheat Board, who was it that stood against it? It was the Liberal Party of Canada. The Liberals should be ashamed of themselves.
RCMP
Oral Questions
May 30th, 2007 / 2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Sue Barnes London West, ON
Mr. Speaker, a dozen uniformed RCMP officers alleging harassment, political spying and even worse have come forward asking for protection and a public inquiry to air their claims. The Conservative public safety minister's response is to shrug his shoulders, plug his ears and see no evil, hear no evil.
Is this wilful blindness or gross negligence? When it comes to protecting the integrity of Canada's national police, why is the public safety minister thwarting real action?
RCMP
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Okanagan—Coquihalla
B.C.
Conservative
Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety
Mr. Speaker, not only are we the only ones who are taking action to get to the bottom of some of the concerns that have been raised, and we are doing that through outright investigation, we are also the only ones who actually stand up for the integrity of the RCMP and regularly report on the good things that they do from coast to coast.
I can also add that not long ago I communicated with some officers who had some information they wanted to bring forward. I verified to them that anything they bring forward would be looked at in all sincerity and that no officers would ever be held in contempt or in any way dealt with negatively because they were bringing forward bona fide information. I have communicated that.
RCMP
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Sue Barnes London West, ON
Mr. Speaker, RCMP officers told the committee yesterday how the pension scandal investigation was suppressed and dismantled by senior RCMP management.
Why is the public safety minister so determined to subvert the investigation of this alleged abuse? Why not do the obvious, what every expert knows is necessary, and call a full judicial inquiry?
RCMP
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Okanagan—Coquihalla
B.C.
Conservative
Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety
Mr. Speaker, I always appreciate courage at any time, especially someone who can stand up as a member of the former regime when it had evidence that this pension problem was unfolding and it did nothing. In fact, we were told by officers that my predecessor, the former minister, was given the information and did not even talk to the commissioner about it.
I admire her courage in standing up in the face of absolute inaction by her party. I would appreciate a little admiration from her for what our party is doing to get to the bottom of this.
Festivals and Special Events
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Bloc
Maka Kotto Saint-Lambert, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women has refused the unanimous request of the National Assembly of Quebec to transfer funding for festivals. The minister said she wants to support small cultural events and not just big ones. However, the smallest-scale cultural events are the ones that are in desperate need of money.
When will the minister realize that her bungling is harmful to all the communities? Will she finally listen to reason and immediately transfer the proper share of the new funding to Quebec so that it can be distributed as soon as possible?
Festivals and Special Events
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Durham
Ontario
Conservative
Bev Oda Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women
Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, this is new funding for a new program. This is not a transfer to the provinces. The new program will help small and medium size events, not just the major festivals. The program will be in place at the end of the summer.
Festivals and Special Events
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Bloc
Raynald Blais Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC
Mr. Speaker, does the minister realize that her refusal to provide funding has already been harmful? In the Magdalen Islands, the Rendez-vous Aventure Festival, which has been around for seven years, lost its licence because it did not have enough funding. Major economic spinoffs from this festival, including a world cup event, are disappearing, not to mention dozens of jobs.
Will the minister take action or wait for hundreds of events to be cancelled, thereby denying regional communities such important summer jobs and economic spinoffs?
Festivals and Special Events
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Jonquière—Alma
Québec
Conservative
Jean-Pierre Blackburn Minister of Labour and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
Mr. Speaker, the Economic Development Agency of Canada is a partner of the festivals not just in the greater Montreal area, but throughout Quebec. Furthermore, we have maintained our criteria both for marketing and for product renewal. Last year, the festival the hon. member is referring to received a $180,000 contribution for renewing their product.
However, this year, since it is a matter of marketing, we are maintaining our level of funding for marketing their festival.
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Raymond Simard Saint Boniface, MB
Mr. Speaker, the U.S. is planning to channel overflow waters from Devils Lake in North Dakota into Lake Winnipeg in Manitoba. The previous Liberal government had an agreement with the U.S. that a filter would be installed to ensure invasive alien species would not be introduced into the Lake Winnipeg watershed.
Has the government ensured that this filter has been installed, and is there any evidence of alien species being found in the Lake Winnipeg watershed?
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, it is not quite as our colleague opposite has suggested. Unfortunately, this is another problem that we inherited from the Liberal government.
We are working very closely with Premier Gary Doer. I have taken this issue directly to the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and directly to senior officials in the administration south of the border.
Working constructively and collectively with Manitoba, we believe we can ensure the environmental protection of this important part of our country.
Senate Tenure Legislation
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
Conservative
Ron Cannan Kelowna—Lake Country, BC
Mr. Speaker, our government introduced Bill S-4, the bill to limit the terms of senators, because we firmly believe the Senate must change. It is unacceptable that in the year 2007, 140 years after Confederation, unelected and unaccountable senators can serve up to 45 years. Can members believe that? Yet it appears that the Liberal Senate refuses to act, refuses to accept change, refuses to be held accountable.
Could the Minister for Democratic Reform tell the House of the status of this important democratic reform?
