Debates of Dec. 3rd, 2008
House of Commons Hansard #12 of the 40th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was economic.
Topics
- Question Period
- Opposition Coalition Proposal
- Persons with Disabilities
- Gala Award Ceremony
- Violence Against Women
- Opposition Coalition Proposal
- Cluster Munitions
- Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
- Anti-personnel mines
- The Conservative Government
- Opposition Parties
- The Political Situation
- Persons with Disabilities
- The Political Situation
- The Environment
- The Economy
- Opposition Coalition Proposal
- The Economy
- The Conservative Government
- The Prime Minister
- Proposed Coalition
- The Economy
- The Conservative Government
- Status of Women
- The Economy
- Points of Order
- Individual Member's Expenditures
- Gwich'in Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement Implementation Committee
- Nunutsiavut Government Final Agreement Implementation Committee
- Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act
- Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act
- Indian Oil and Gas Act
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Employment Insurance Act
- Canada Evidence Act
- Criminal Code
- Louis Riel Act
- First Nation's Children's Health Protection Act
- Canada Water Export Prohibition Act
- Food and Drugs Act
- Currency Act
- Canada Post Corporation Act
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Motions for Papers
- Economic and Fiscal Statement
The Economy
Statements By Members
December 3rd, 2008 / 2:10 p.m.
Liberal
John McCallum Markham—Unionville, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Liberal-led coalition has a plan to support jobs through more infrastructure, more job training, more social housing. and support for struggling industries to make them competitive in the 21st century. It is a fiscally responsible plan. We will have a dollar figure when we know if the Conservatives are hiding a deficit of $5 billion or $15 billion. There will be no structural deficits and we will eliminate the existing Conservative deficit by year four.
What does the Prime Minister not understand about Canada's need for more infrastructure, more training and more social housing? Why has he failed to provide any plan to protect the savings and pensions and jobs of Canadians? Why, in his own words, does he use every legal means at his disposal to protect his own job while not even lifting his little finger to save the jobs of ordinary Canadians?
Opposition Coalition Proposal
Statements By Members
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
Peter Goldring Edmonton East, AB
Mr. Speaker, I first ran for a seat in the House of Commons in 1997 to stand up for Canada and fight for national unity.
However, the separatist contract signed by the opposition parties this week threatens to wipe out all of the progress we have made on the Canadian unity issue.
Yesterday, Jacques Parizeau, a prominent leader of the separatist movement, endorsed the separatist contract between the Liberals and separatists. Let me read what Jacques Parizeau said just a few short years ago: “The image projected needs to be one of a weak, disoriented federal government which will be even more so in the future. That is perfect”.
He is right about one thing. This separatist contract would weaken Canada's economy, would weaken Canada's democracy and put the unity of our country in the hands of separatists.
The actions of the Liberal-separatist coalition will have real consequences for all of Canada. When will the Liberals come to their senses and do what is right?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Saint-Laurent—Cartierville
Québec
Liberal
Stéphane Dion Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Speaker, the enormity of the economic crisis facing Canada is unprecedented. Every day brings more bad news. Yesterday, 250 jobs were lost at Magna Powertrain in Cape Breton.
The OECD predicts that hundreds of thousands jobs will be lost next year in Canada. Why did the Prime Minister refuse to take action to stimulate our economy and get it back on track?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, this government is taking action by preparing the upcoming budget and additional measures for our economy. The Liberal Party leader proposes to help the economy by signing a pact with the Quebec sovereignists to govern the country. This is not a plan to improve the economy; it is a plan to destroy this country, which is why he should withdraw his proposal.
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Saint-Laurent—Cartierville
Québec
Liberal
Stéphane Dion Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Speaker, that is such nonsense that I will not even reply to it, and the Prime Minister knows it.
He shirked his responsibilities—
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Liberal
Stéphane Dion Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC
Mr. Speaker, this is absolute foolishness, and we will not respond to absolute foolishness.
He shirked his responsibilities towards the economy and our workers. He is hiding behind his abysmal record. He is hiding from Parliament.
Why did he fail in his duty to bring in a plan to get our economy back on track?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, today the leader of the Liberal Party received an unqualified endorsement from his plan from Jacques Parizeau. Let me tell members, in Mr. Parizeau's own words, why he supports the kind of arrangement the leader of the Liberal Party is proposing: “A weaker government in Ottawa is eminently satisfying. The image must be one of a weak, disoriented government, which will become weaker and more disoriented in the future. This is perfect”.
The leader of the Liberal Party is not working with us to prepare the budget and to strengthen this economy, but to weaken this country.
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Saint-Laurent—Cartierville
Québec
Liberal
Stéphane Dion Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Speaker, a weak government is a government that does not have the confidence of this House and wants to govern. Never mind, there is an alternative: better public transit for our cities and our communities; cleaner water; clean energy; help for our manufacturing sector, our auto sector, our forestry sector and their workers; and a plan to create jobs.
Why does the Prime Minister care more about his own job than allowing Parliament to save the jobs of Canadians?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, if the leader of the Liberal Party wants to save the jobs of Canadians, he can put on the table specific proposals that will save those jobs. He can reach across the aisle and work with this government, which will be pleased to work with him on saving this economy, but he must walk away from this deal with Jacques Parizeau and the separatists which can do nothing but weaken this country, which is Mr. Parizeau's very objective.
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Liberal
Ralph Goodale Wascana, SK
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister ignores the truth. Just for the record, the Bloc Québécois has supported the Conservative government at least 140 times, including 14 confidence votes, so let us not be distracted by the red herrings and stick to the real issue, and that is the economy, abject Conservative economic failure.
Beyond all the same old stuff, why is there nothing new for Canadians, for infrastructure, for housing, for manufacturing, for forestry and autos, and for training? Why do the Conservatives have no new plan right now?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, let us be very clear about what the leader of the Liberal Party is proposing. He is proposing to govern with the Bloc Québécois and to give it a veto over all important decisions, over all financial policies in every sector of this country. That is the price he is prepared to pay to become prime minister. That can do nothing but weaken the Canadian economy, weaken our democracy, and weaken our country.
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Liberal
Ralph Goodale Wascana, SK
Mr. Speaker, just like the flags yesterday, what the Prime Minister has just said is absolutely false.
The Conservatives cannot face the truth. Their own Parliamentary Budget Officer says they are wrong. They are in deficit. It is their deficit. They created it all by themselves. Their previous budgets have not succeeded and now they are all worn out.
Canada is in a recession with no margin left to protect Canadians and no new stimulus. Why can the government not get the point that its economic statement was offensive and that this country needs a different, better plan right now?
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, the leader of the Liberal Party sat down with the leader of the separatist party on national television. Those pictures are all there. They will show those flags put way off to the side where they are out of the camera angles.
If the Liberal Party continues down this path, those images will never be forgotten by the Canadian people. If the Liberals want to help the Canadian economy, they should sit down with us in front of the flag and do it now.
The Economy
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Bloc
Gilles Duceppe Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC
Mr. Speaker, it is confirmed in a letter: in 2004, the Prime Minister was prepared to go to the Governor General, with the support of the Bloc Québécois. The willingness of the former Reform members to associate with separatists, as they would say, is not recent. In fact, the very day of the November 2000 election, a detailed proposal for a coalition was sent to the Bloc Québécois on behalf of the leader of the Canadian Alliance.
Will the Prime Minister admit that he, in 2004, and the leader of the Canadian Alliance, in 2000, were prepared to govern with the Bloc? How—
