An Act to amend the Criminal Code (prize fights)

This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2013.

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

The enactment amends the Criminal Code by expanding the list of permitted sports under the prize fighting provisions.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other S-209s:

S-209 (2021) Law Pandemic Day Act
S-209 (2020) An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Regulation Adapting the Canada Elections Act for the Purposes of a Referendum (voting age)
S-209 (2020) An Act to amend the Department for Women and Gender Equality Act
S-209 (2015) An Act to amend the Official Languages Act (communications with and services to the public)
S-209 (2013) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (exception to mandatory minimum sentences for manslaughter and criminal negligence causing death)
S-209 (2010) National Day of Service Act

Votes

June 5, 2013 Passed That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Nov. 28, 2012 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10 a.m.

Liberal

Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

moved for leave to introduce Bill S-209, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (prize fights).

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to introduce Bill S-209, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (prize fights).

This legislation seeks to amend the Criminal Code by expanding the list of permitted sports under the prize fighting provisions. This change to Canada's prize fighting laws is long overdue.

Mixed martial arts have come a long way as a sport in the past 20 years. Their safety record is admirable, their product is popular throughout Canada and worldwide, and the list of Canadians like Georges St-Pierre who excel at this sport is constantly growing.

I am proud to do my part as a member of Parliament to modernize our laws, since this particular part of the Criminal Code has not been updated since 1934.

Currently, close to 100,000 Canadians who practice combat sports, some of these sports are recognized by the International Olympic committee, such as judo and tae kwon do, can be considered to doing so illegally under the current provisions of the Criminal Code. Bill S-209 would merely correct this oversight so that Canada can effectively regulate acceptable combat sports openly.

Seeing as how this bill is non-controversial and is a sensible piece of legislation that clearly addresses a blind spot in the Criminal Code, I look forward to seeing the bill passed expeditiously with the support and co-operation of all members.

(Motion agreed to and bill read the first time)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Gerry Ritz Conservative Battlefords—Lloydminster, SK

Mr. Speaker, there has been consultation with all of the parties regarding the second reading of Bill S-11, the safe foods for Canadians act, and I would ask for unanimous consent for the following motion. I move that notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, Bill S-11, An Act respecting food commodities, including their inspection, their safety, their labelling and advertising, their import, export and interprovincial trade, the establishment of standards for them, the registration or licensing of persons who perform certain activities related to them, the establishment of standards governing establishments where those activities are performed and the registration of establishments where those activities are performed, be deemed read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.

The Speaker Andrew Scheer

Does the hon. minister have the unanimous consent of the House to propose this motion?

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on this point of order because I am slightly confused by what the Minister of Agriculture just proposed. He suggested in his submission that there had been some sort of consultations that had been agreed to by the other parties. The bill sat in the Senate for more than 120 days. The bill was also killed by the government by prorogation. We have told the government quite clearly that we are looking to expeditiously move this through to the second phase into the committee for study--

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 18th, 2012 / 10:05 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Allow me this, Mr. Speaker, because I thought the government actually had some respect for the parliamentary process. If the Conservatives sought some urgency on this, clearly more than four months in the Senate does not describe urgency. If they had sought some urgency on this, why was it killed through prorogation in the previous iteration of the bill. It seems like a strange idea that they would now come through and say that there have been consultations to do what the minister has just suggested when there have not been.

We will move this expeditiously through while respecting the democratic principles that I thought we had all agreed with.