An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bestiality)


Michelle Rempel  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)


Introduced, as of Dec. 13, 2017

Subscribe to a feed (what's a feed?) of speeches and votes in the House related to Bill C-388.


This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament often publishes better independent summaries.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to define the term “bestiality”.


All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, provided by the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

December 13th, 2017 / 3:45 p.m.
See context


Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-388, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bestiality).

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to introduce an act to amend the Criminal Code, bestiality. On June 9, 2016, the Supreme Court ruled that the Criminal Code provisions around bestiality do not adequately define which sex acts with animals are prohibited.

Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld an acquittal of a British Columbia man who was charged with bestiality after compelling the family dog to sexually abuse his daughter. This case makes it obvious that a loophole for sex abusers to avoid conviction exists. This case highlights the need for updated legislation to keep both humans and animals safe. The current law is reflective of an archaic understanding of sex, and the change the bill seeks to make reflects the language of the Supreme Court ruling and, frankly, is a no-brainer.

The Liberals should have introduced legislation to correct this issue immediately after the ruling. Nearly a year and a half later, I hope that tabling this bill today will encourage the Prime Minister to stop dragging his feet, and to take action to make this common sense change.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)