Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023

An Act to implement the 2023 Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Ukraine

Sponsor

Mary Ng  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment implements the Canada–Ukraine Free Trade Agreement, done at Ottawa on September 22, 2023.
Among other things, the enactment
(a) sets out rules of interpretation;
(b) specifies that no recourse is to be taken on the basis of sections 9 to 15 or any order made under those sections, or on the basis of the provisions of that Agreement, without the consent of the Attorney General of Canada;
(c) approves that Agreement;
(d) provides for the payment by Canada of its share of the expenditures associated with the operation of the institutional and administrative aspects of that Agreement;
(e) gives the Governor in Council the power to make orders in accordance with that Agreement;
(f) requires the Minister for International Trade to ensure that Canadian companies operating in Ukraine comply with the principles and guidelines referred to in the Agreement; and
(g) amends certain Acts to give effect to Canada’s obligations under that Agreement.
Finally, the enactment repeals the Canada–Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act that was enacted in 2017.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-57s:

C-57 (2017) Law An Act to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act
C-57 (2015) Support for Families Act
C-57 (2013) Safeguarding Canada's Seas and Skies Act
C-57 (2010) Improving Trade Within Canada Act

Votes

Feb. 6, 2024 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-57, An Act to implement the 2023 Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Ukraine
Feb. 5, 2024 Failed Bill C-57, An Act to implement the 2023 Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Ukraine (recommittal to a committee)
Dec. 12, 2023 Passed Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-57, An Act to implement the 2023 Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Ukraine
Nov. 21, 2023 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-57, An Act to implement the 2023 Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Ukraine

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-57 aims to modernize the existing free trade agreement between Canada and Ukraine. The updated agreement includes new chapters on trade in services and investment, as well as revisions to existing chapters focusing on labor, the environment, and digital trade. A point of contention is the inclusion of language about promoting carbon pricing, with some arguing it imposes unnecessary environmental policy while others claim it simply reflects Ukraine's existing commitment to such measures.

Liberal

  • Strong support for Ukraine: Liberal members expressed strong support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, highlighting Canada's military, economic, and humanitarian aid. They emphasized the importance of the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement for Ukraine's economic stability and reconstruction during and after the war with Russia.
  • Modernized trade agreement: The Liberals underscored the benefits of the modernized Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement, including new chapters and provisions for investments, services, labor, and the environment. They argued that the agreement would facilitate increased trade between the two countries, support Ukraine's economy, and attract Canadian expertise and investment.
  • Criticism of Conservative opposition: Liberal members criticized the Conservative Party's opposition to the free trade agreement, accusing them of spreading disinformation and undermining unanimous support for Ukraine. They refuted the Conservative argument that the agreement would impose carbon taxes on Ukraine, calling it a "red herring".
  • Defending environmental standards: Liberal members argued that the modernized agreement includes provisions recognizing the importance of mutually supportive trade and climate change policies. They highlighted the addition of articles to address key global environmental issues, such as plastic pollution and waste, and promote trade of environmental goods and services.

Conservative

  • Opposed to carbon pricing.: The Conservative party is against including carbon pricing in trade agreements, fearing it will lead to mandated carbon taxes in future agreements. They view the inclusion of carbon pricing as an attack on Ukraine, since most Ukrainians use carbon-based fuels for heating.
  • Liberals' hypocrisy.: Conservatives criticize the Liberal government for hypocrisy, citing the export permit waiver for a gas turbine that aided Russia, Canadian detonators found in Russian mines, and the lack of wartime insurance for Canadian businesses wanting to help Ukraine.
  • Existing agreement sufficient.: The Conservatives believe the existing free trade agreement with Ukraine is sufficient and that the updated agreement does not include essential support for Ukraine, such as LNG exports and munitions, while unnecessarily imposing carbon tax language.
  • Prioritize weapon shipments.: The Conservatives advocate for sending weapons and munitions to Ukraine, accusing the Liberals of prioritizing carbon tax measures over providing necessary defence supplies and energy security.

NDP

  • In favour of free trade: The NDP supports free trade and the original agreement with Ukraine in 2017. Their support is conditional on the protection and creation of Canadian jobs, the environment, and the well-being of all citizens.
  • Ukraine friendship special: The NDP recognizes the importance of the Canada-Ukraine relationship, highlighting the large Ukrainian diaspora in Canada and Canada's early recognition of Ukraine's independence. They believe in supporting Ukraine during the conflict with Russia.
  • Against investor-state dispute: The NDP is against the inclusion of investor-state dispute system (ISDS) provisions in trade agreements, as they allow foreign corporations to sue Canadian governments. The party attempted to remove the ISDS implementation in this agreement, but was voted down.
  • Process concerns: The NDP emphasizes the importance of parliamentary input into trade negotiations before they begin, advocating for increased transparency and adherence to established procedures. They note the compressed timeline of debate on this agreement.

Bloc

  • Supports the agreement: The Bloc supports the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement implementation act, as it puts some meat on the bones of the previous skeletal version and presents promising opportunities for Quebec, particularly for pork producers and engineering firms.
  • Investor-state dispute settlement: The Bloc opposes the inclusion of the investor-state dispute settlement clause, as it allows multinationals to sue states when government measures affect their profits, potentially hindering Canada's ability to seize assets of individuals supporting Russia and limiting the power of states to legislate.
  • Enforcement of responsible conduct: The Bloc Québécois successfully amended the bill to shift from lofty principles to political accountability, requiring the Minister to ensure Canadian companies comply with responsible conduct guidelines in Ukraine and to establish a process for handling non-compliance complaints.
  • Lack of transparency: The Bloc criticizes the lack of transparency in trade agreements, noting that MPs are often excluded from the process and that the government avoids scrutiny from opponents, calling for increased democratic control over agreements and greater involvement of elected members in negotiations.
  • Canada doing the bare minimum: The Bloc suggests Canada's primary objective is to appear as a reliable ally by doing the minimum, favouring actions that look good over those that actually work and providing modest military support compared to other countries, despite the agreement's aim to address corruption and promote labour, environmental, and human rights standards.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / noon

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

I am sorry, but that is not a point of order. That is a point of debate.

The hon. member for Dufferin—Caledon.

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Madam Speaker, with respect to that point of order, the—

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

It was not a point of order.

The hon. member for Dufferin—Caledon, on the question.

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Madam Speaker, what actually has harmed Ukraine was the government's decision to grant a waiver to export a gas turbine. It is interesting. The Liberals use President Zelenskyy's name all the time in support of their cause to try to score cheap political points. President Zelenskyy had a few things to say about that waiver.

If a terrorist state can squeeze out such an exemption to sanctions, what exemptions would it want? Moreover, it is dangerous not only for Ukraine but for all countries of the democratic world. Zelenskyy called on the Canadian government to reverse that decision. The Ukrainian ambassador went on to say that Russia is using energy as a weapon in Europe and all over the world and this money and fuel were going to support the war in Ukraine. Do the Liberals regret that they actually aided President Putin in his war by exporting that gas turbine?

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, as the member tries to change the channel, we need to recognize the reality of today. The reality of today is that there is one political entity, better known as the Conservative Party of Canada, that seems to want to take the side of Russia over Ukraine. That has been clearly demonstrated—

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

No, giving the turbine to Russia—

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

Order. The hon. member had an opportunity to ask his question. Now, whether he likes the answer or not, he needs to take the opportunity to listen. If he has other questions, he can wait until I ask for questions and comments.

The hon. parliamentary secretary.

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker—

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

On a point of order, the hon. member for Dufferin—Caledon.

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Madam Speaker, for the member to suggest that I support Russia is despicable and—

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

Actually, the hon. member's question seemed to indicate that on the other side as well. I would ask members to please refrain from doing that. We know that everybody in this House does not support Russia. That has been reaffirmed in the House. I would ask members to please refrain from saying that during their questions and during their comments.

The hon. parliamentary secretary.

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, I see some individuals on the other side, just as they should well be, are very ashamed of the way they have conducted themselves when it comes to issues with respect to Ukraine. Where there should have been unanimous support for Ukraine at a very difficult time in its history, we see the Conservative Party under its current leadership looking south to be inspired by MAGA politics. That is to the detriment of Ukraine. The Conservatives have to take responsibility for their actions, and by that I mean their votes, and not try to hide behind the Speaker's back.

The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C‑57, An Act to implement the 2023 Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Ukraine, be read the third time and passed.

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:10 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

Madam Speaker, it would be worth our while to discuss this bill. I would like the member for Winnipeg North to tell me about his vision for the free trade agreement with Ukraine. We obviously agree on the bill, though it still has some shortcomings. The Bloc Québécois has long objected to the fact that private companies can sue governments under free trade agreements by claiming that a government's legislation is detrimental to a company's trade. We see this as a mistake that needs to be corrected.

Is my colleague willing to study this issue and make improvements?

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

December 12th, 2023 / 12:10 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, as the member is likely aware, there are very serious limitations as to what we can do with respect to making changes. The simple reason for this is that we have an agreement that is signed off on, and it is more of a ratification process. I do not know the details of what kind of modifications would, in fact, be acceptable without having to sign a different agreement.

Having said that, the real benefits of the agreement for both Canada and Ukraine deal with everything from infrastructure to high-tech companies, as well as many agricultural benefits. In essence, it enhances opportunities for both countries to be able to develop stronger and healthier trade links.