Thank you, Chair.
Thank you to our guests for being here today.
I'll continue just on the questions to IPA Group.
I'm kind of interested in the fact that you had pointed out on page three of your submission to us today that following the U.S. special inspector general's report on what was happening in situ, they had talked about the fact that they have equipment there but don't have people who can actually use it.
It reminds me of how international development was done in the 1970s. We would lay out elaborate irrigation systems, and then when we left, it rusted.
But what I'm really curious about is this evaluation. Do you know of any similar evaluation? We get the Auditor General looking at things, but in terms of our value for money and how things are working in situ from a Canadian perspective, do you know of similar evaluations that have been done beyond your own project? You do an internal evaluation, presumably, but is there anything that's similar to the U.S. special inspector general?