No. No one ever brought that up as a concern until Minister Bibeau did. Let me just be clear here in what the definition says. It says that the exemption is for eligible farming activity, which means the operation of eligible farming machinery on a farm for farming purposes. Then it says, “an industrial machine”.
No one would say that a grain dryer is not an industrial machine. No one would say that a grain dryer is not farming machinery. There's no other purpose. You're not going to go tanning in a grain dryer. This is a common sense understanding. As a lawyer, I can tell you, Francis, anyone can sue anyone for anything at any time. It's a matter of whether it has any weight.
As I said, I want the tone of this to be collaborative. If the government says to me, “You know what? We like your bill and we want to include grain drying in there,” I'm not going to object. Let's make the amendment, and if that is the difference between this bill passing and not, let's include it.