Certainly.
I think that needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Even the clarity on that would be much more helpful than the lack of clarity that we currently have.
Again, to go back to it, I'm a big believer in the outcome-based regulatory environment. The regulatory environment we have is good, but, again, it's over-indexed on process and under-indexed on outcomes.
If we take, for example, something like drone spraying, improving the efficacy of the residual data that the PMRA needs can be achieved in a year. If you wanted to even double that and say two years—prove it the first year and see if it can be replicated the second year—then that's two years, instead of seven. That's much more reasonable.
