I think as a model for artist remuneration, collective licensing is a very good one. It's an efficient way, I think, of supplying the educational marketplace with material that is useful and that will be used and reused. The principle of payment for use comes back via that collective licensing model to artists and to publishers.
You asked about other jurisdictions. I know that Australia and the U.K. have systems of collective licensing that have also more narrowly defined exceptions for educational use, and I'm not here to argue that there should be no exceptions for educational use; I think there probably should be. I think the situation we have now is that there is a lack of clarity about these exceptions and there is widespread use that is not delivering back.