Evidence of meeting #36 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was shall.
A recording is available from Parliament.
11:10 p.m.
Liberal
Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC
We've been using “original French language program” throughout the act. Because of the way the English is worded, this changes the term we've been using to fix the English version throughout the act.
The clause was actually correct in this case on the English side, but not on the French side. My amendment only deals with the French side. Martin's does the English side, too, but it amends it wrongly.
11:10 p.m.
Liberal
11:10 p.m.
Conservative
11:10 p.m.
Liberal
11:10 p.m.
Conservative
Laila Goodridge Conservative Fort McMurray—Cold Lake, AB
Madam Chair, I understand now. Mr. Housefather gave an interesting explanation that clarified it.
Thank you.
11:10 p.m.
Conservative
11:10 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
Shall BQ-16 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 5; yeas 1 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
11:10 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
BQ-16 does not carry, so we can go to Liberal-10.
Shall Liberal-10 carry?
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 11; nays 0 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall amendment CPC-20 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall CPC-20.1 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
11:15 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
We will now move to BQ-17.
Please be aware that if BQ-17 is adopted, NDP-19.2 cannot be moved due to a line conflict. If BQ-17 is adopted, NDP-19.2 becomes moot, as they are identical. If BQ-17 is defeated, so is NDP-19.2, for the same reason.
Shall BQ-17 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 9; yeas 2 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
BQ-17 does not carry, so we shall go to NDP-19.2.
11:15 p.m.
Legislative Clerk
Madam Chair, NDP-19.2 is identical to BQ-17, so it's also defeated.
11:15 p.m.
Liberal
11:15 p.m.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC
On a point of order, I think we would move on to NDP-19.3
11:15 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
I do not have NDP-19.3 yet because that would be going into clause 11, Mr. Julian. We're finishing up this clause.
Shall CPC-20.2 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
(Clause 10 as amended agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)
(On clause 11)
Please note that if NDP-19.3 is adopted, BQ-19 cannot be moved due to a line conflict.
Shall NDP-19.3 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 10; yeas 1 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall BQ-18 carry?
11:20 p.m.
Conservative
John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON
I have a point of order, Madam Chair.
I know we're not supposed to debate, but could I get clarification on this one as well?
It says “radiodiffusion” for both English and French. This is a translation correction in the French version. I just seek clarity on that one.
11:20 p.m.
Legislative Clerk
No, that's fine.
Mr. Nater, the bill amends paragraphs 10(1)(f) to 10(1)(h) in the French version only. The bill is in effect on both sides of the column in French because it amends only three verbs in the French version.
11:20 p.m.
Liberal
11:20 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
Shall we now vote on BQ-18?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 2 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall BQ-19 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 9; yeas 2 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall CPC-21 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall CPC-22 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
11:25 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
Shall CPC-22.1 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
I'm going to move to LIB-11, with a little note to the committee.