Yes, thank you. I appreciate the witnesses' being here today.
I have a piece here. We look at organizations...and I think that's one of the recommendations: We'll look at whether the sports organizations have policies and procedures in place.
I'm going to go to the parents on this one.
A provincial-national organization in Canada—not naming it—has it clearly defined. If you, as a parent or parents, have concerns about a coach, you go to this organization, they appoint a third party—independent—to review to see if it's worth going ahead. In this case that I know of, they did go ahead. They appointed a board person to do this. Then, the coach found out, and the coach contacted parents with emails that a parent took to the police. The coach was charged. Now that parent is in front of a commission to throw this concern out because the parent broke the confidentiality, even though the police ruled this as criminal.
Where do we protect the parents in this? The parents are being left out.
When you say they need to take an active role, it is very difficult. This is not the only case I've run across where the parents are at risk. Most of the parents in this group have backed away from it. There's one parent left. The coach may be out of this one, but they'll coach somewhere else.
What is your response to how we solve it for the parents?