Evidence of meeting #94 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was point.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jacques Maziade  Committee Clerk

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

I call this meeting to order.

Welcome everyone to meeting number 94 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.

Today's meeting is taking place in a hybrid format pursuant to the Standing Orders. Members are attending in person in the room or remotely using the Zoom application. We have two currently, Ms. Dhillon and Mr. Coteau.

It's good to see you both here this morning.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind all participants of this meeting that screenshots or taking photos of your screen are not permitted. The proceedings will be made available via the House of Commons website.

As you know, although this room is equipped with a powerful audio system, feedback events can occur, and you all know to keep your phones away from the microphones as we go.

We'll open the meeting with committee business.

Ms. Thomas, I saw your hand up first.

8:20 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

A point of order.

8:20 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

I would like, through you, to have the clerk confirm that we had CRTC scheduled to come today. There are very important questions that need to be asked of the CRTC, including around regulations and telecom companies. Canadians are being gouged. There's also the massive influx of disinformation from the Fox propaganda network and others. Those are all important questions.

Can you confirm that because of the Conservative filibuster we've had to cancel the CRTC appearance yet again? You will recall that a couple of years ago, we had to delay the CRTC for an hour—

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

I was surprised too, Mr. Julian. I expected to see Ms. Eatrides today, but I saw “committee business” and no mention of the CRTC chair.

We have a new clerk here today. Geneviève is not feeling well today and couldn't join us in person, but Jacques Maziade is with us today. As for the request for Ms. Eatrides, she was scheduled to appear today, so....

You know, Mr. Julian, I don't know what happened. I do agree with you. When I did see the notice come out on committee business, I had thought that Ms. Eatrides would be here for at least one hour today. That has not happened for some reason, but I will give that to the chair, and we'll move forward.

That was a very good point of order, because I too was expecting to see the head of the CRTC here today, so thank you for that. Does that satisfy you?

8:20 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

I may come back to this issue. Are we currently in camera?

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

We're in public.

8:20 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Okay. The committee notice says “in camera”.

If we're in public, I want to say that this is the second time because of Conservative filibusters that we've had to delay or cancel the CRTC appearance, and I find it very regrettable. The Conservative filibusters blocking—

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

I'm going to say to you, Mr. Julian, that this was out of our hands. It was on the schedule to have the CRTC chair with us today, and I have no reason why Ms. Eatrides did not show.

8:20 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

You will recall the last time the CRTC came, the CRTC was waiting outside while a Conservative filibuster was debating having the CRTC before the committee. It was bizarre. It was some kind of bizarre, dysfunctional....

I think it's important to note that this is the second time the CRTC has been cancelled or delayed because of a Conservative filibuster.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

They didn't cancel because of one side filibustering. Today's business should have been Ms. Eatrides, and I have no reason why Ms. Eatrides wasn't on today's agenda. I asked the same question of our group yesterday.

To be honest with you, I have the same issue that you have, but it's not because of any filibusters going on. Today's committee business was scheduled for the head of the CRTC to be with us today, so I appreciate your point of order.

8:20 a.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

I have a point of order, as well, Mr. Chair.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

Mr. Champoux, do you want to speak on...?

8:20 a.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Yes, absolutely.

I note that Mr. Julian is drawing a parallel between the filibustering done by our Conservative colleagues at our last meeting with the CRTC, but the situation was different at the time, Mr. Chair, because the witnesses—

Let me finish, please.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Point of order.

8:20 a.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Mr. Chair, I'm on my point of order. I will finish it if I can have my colleagues' attention.

Mr. Chair, I would like to know if we can ask the clerk to explain to us what happened in the order of invitation for today's meeting.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Mr. Chair, this is debate.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

Okay, so—

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

This is ridiculous. This is debate.

8:20 a.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

No, it's a point of order. I want to know about—

Mr. Chair, if Ms. Thomas can show a modicum of respect—

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

Here is the ruling I'm going to make right now. Hold on.

Mr. Champoux, finish your comments. Then I will go to Mrs. Thomas. I have Mr. Coteau and I have Ms. Gladu. We have a lineup here.

Go ahead.

8:20 a.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Let me finish before deciding that it is not a point of order!

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I want to know if we can ask the clerk to explain to us what happened to cause the order of today's meeting to be changed. I would like a clarification from the clerk if he has the information. Since our regular clerk is participating virtually, she may have some clarifications for us on the change we experienced with Ms. Eatrides' failure to appear.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

According to our new clerk, it has been rescheduled at the direction of the chair. The chair made the decision to move Ms. Eatrides to another date. I don't know the date. We haven't decided that. The chair has decided that.

8:20 a.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Thank you.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Kevin Waugh

If I continue on, I have to go to Mr. Coteau.