Evidence of meeting #41 for Canadian Heritage in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was venues.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Filsinger  Chief Executive Officer, Iron Fox Games
Morin  Executive Director, Arts on the Ave Edmonton Society
Simms  Manager, Program, Culture, and Events, Glasgow Square Theatre
Thibault  Executive Director, Society for Arts and Technology
Kontoyanni  Chair, Union des artistes
Curzi  Director General, Union des artistes

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

I call the meeting to order. Welcome to meeting number 41 of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.

Before we begin, I'd ask all in-person participants to read the guidelines on the updated cards on the table in front of you. These are measures in place to help prevent audio feedback incidents and to protect the health and safety of all participants, especially our interpreters. You will notice a QR code on the card that links to a short awareness video.

Pursuant to the routine motion adopted by the committee, I can confirm that the witnesses have completed the required connection tests in advance of this meeting.

Please wait until I recognize you by name before you speak, and all comments should be addressed through the chair.

Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), we're meeting today for our third meeting regarding our study on the state of creative and performance spaces across Canada.

Before we go any further, I want to remark to members that you may have seen this letter from a witness from last week. We received it in our inboxes recently. I'll read it out. It's from Jennifer Brewin of the Globe Theatre, who appeared on May 28 at meeting number 39.

She says:

I have concerns about comments made by two members of the committee, MPs Kerry Diotte and Kevin Waugh, on May 28, 2026. They voiced complaints about a play presented by Regina's Globe Theatre.

Go ahead, Mrs. Thomas.

8:15 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

I'm sorry, but I'm just curious: Since when is it customary practice to read the correspondence that is sent to this committee? I've never seen this done before.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

No, it's not common, but I thought it was a good point for this committee to talk about how we treat witnesses going forward.

This is a witness who felt very attacked on a topic that didn't have anything to do with the subject we were studying, so I just wanted to ask members to perhaps be sensitive to the fact that a lot of the witnesses we invite appear in good faith. They're not politicians, and we should treat them with respect.

8:15 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

On that point of order, I can understand that. I do think that we need to conduct ourselves with respect at this committee, both towards our colleagues across the way and towards the witnesses who come. My concern is that there are two individuals who are named in this letter. They are certainly not the only ones who have asked questions that have caused discomfort at this table. There have been members from all parties who have done that over the time that we've been at this committee.

It seems as though these individuals—my colleagues—are being targeted, because you're choosing to read their names into the record when you could simply remind the members at this table that we need to be respectful. I would ask you to reconsider, Chair.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

That's a fair comment, and I'm happy to leave it at that.

Members, just keep in mind that we invite witnesses in good faith to come and give us their thoughts on a specifically stated study topic, and we shouldn't veer too far from that or treat them as if they were politicians who are on the firing line.

Go ahead, Mr. Waugh.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon South, SK

Madam Chair, you've read my name and Mr. Diotte's name into the record already this morning. Is there any way you can omit those?

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

I'm sorry...?

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon South, SK

Is there any way you can omit what you have just said?

My name is already on record this morning, and so is Mr. Diotte's, so it's kind of a point of privilege. You've already mentioned both of our names, and that's not customary around this table or in any other committees, so I'm just wondering how we can solve this issue. Is there any way that you can strike both of our names from the record?

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

I'm not sure. Mr. Clerk...?

No, there is no way. We'll leave it as it is, Mr. Waugh. I'm sorry if you feel that your privilege was damaged in any way, but I just wanted to make the point that we did get this letter, and I found it concerning. We'll move on from there.

Go ahead, Mr. Diotte.

8:20 a.m.

Conservative

Kerry Diotte Conservative Edmonton Griesbach, AB

As a point of order, I had comments on those videos saying that she gave as good as she got, so I think I gave her full opportunity to rebut any of the statements that I made or the questions that I had.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

I would agree with that. I think she handled herself very well. I just wanted to make the point that we should be sensitive, and I apologize for reading those names.

We will move on. I hope that this didn't strike fear into the witnesses who are with us today.

We have Ryan Filsinger, the CEO of Iron Fox Games, with us in the room. No, I'm sorry; he's online by video conference.

From Arts on the Ave Edmonton Society, Christy Morin is here with us in the room.

From Glasgow Square Theatre, Morgan Simms is here with us.

From the Society for Arts and Technology, we have Jenny Thibault by video conference, and from the Union des artistes, we have Tania Kontoyanni and Alexandre Curzi.

Welcome to all.

Each organization will have five minutes for an opening statement, and then we will turn to questions from members.

We'll start with Iron Fox Games.

Ryan Filsinger, you have the floor, sir, for five minutes. Go ahead.

Ryan Filsinger Chief Executive Officer, Iron Fox Games

Thank you, Chair and members of the committee, for the invitation to appear before you today.

This study is one I take personally, and I'm grateful for the committee's commitment to understanding how best to support the next generation of artists.

I'm the founder and CEO of Iron Fox Games, a video game development studio based in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. I've worked in this industry for nearly 20 years in the town where I grew up. Our studio has the core value of creating the next generation of game developers. Thus, this topic is quite important to me.

We've benefited from the support of those who came before us. Many of the young artists and developers working in Atlantic Canada today have careers here because of provincial and federal programs that made those opportunities possible. I see it as part of my job to make sure that the next group coming through has the same chance I had.

When most Canadians picture a performance space, they think of a theatre or a rehearsal hall. For game developers, it's a studio floor, a home office and collaboration across many time zones, often all at once. In practice, our creative space is the ecosystem itself—the tools, the distribution platforms we use, the training programs, the studios that give young artists somewhere to start.

When those pieces contract, the opportunities disappear with them. The pullback that happened in the game industry following the boom we saw during COVID has already started removing some of those opportunities for the next generation.

The Maritimes is not where most people expect to find game development, but I believe the track record speaks for itself. Our region developed the first game shown on stage by Steve Jobs at the launch of the App Store back in 2008. Our studios have shipped titles under franchises such as The Simpsons, Doom and Marvel, to name just a few.

What's been built here through VideogamesPEI, training at local schools and support from Innovation PEI and ACOA took years to put into place, but it's still quite vulnerable at this stage. The wave of major regional studio closures, such as at Microsoft, Ubisoft and Electronic Arts, is a reminder of that. Even so, we are finding our footing, with new studios opening in the wake of those closures and with events such as XP Game Connect Atlantic in Halifax, which is happening tomorrow.

Our creative spaces are being eroded from three directions at once. First, post-secondary programs in game design are among the first to be cut when Atlantic school budgets tighten. These programs are the talent pipeline for our small studios.

Second, there is international competition. Developers in eastern Europe, India and now Southeast Asia are producing equivalent work for 40% to 60% less cost, and publishers are acting on that math. It puts direct downward pressure on what Canadian studios can charge and what Canadian artists can realistically earn.

Third, there is AI. According to the GDC's “2025 State of the Game Industry Report”, one in 10 developers lost their job in the last year, with narrative designers and visual artists taking the heaviest losses. Thirty per cent of all active developers believe AI is actively harming the industry, nearly double the year prior. Entry-level creative roles in which young Canadians can start their careers are disappearing quickly. The full effect of AI is still quite unknowable in our industry. However, skilled people are needed to take the best advantage of it.

Canada's video game industry contributed $5.1 billion to the GDP of Canada in 2024. It employs 34,000 workers at an average salary of $102,000 per year and generates 88% of its revenue from exports. P.E.I. posted the country's fastest provincial GDP growth in that same period, at 3.6%, and this sector played a part in that story.

That position won't hold without active support from programs, studios and talent pipelines behind it. This committee has the opportunity to treat creative spaces in the digital arts as economic infrastructure through support for mentorship programs, experimental publishing models and an expanded commitment to programs such as the CMF and other regional initiatives.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

Thank you.

We'll turn next to Arts on the Ave Edmonton Society.

Christy Morin, welcome. You have the floor now for five minutes.

Christy Morin Executive Director, Arts on the Ave Edmonton Society

Thank you so much. Good morning, everybody. Thank you, Madam Chair and members of the committee, and thank you to Canadian Heritage. It is a department that we have grown to love over the past 20 years of working and building Arts on the Ave in Edmonton, Alberta.

Let me share the story of Arts on the Ave first. Thirty-two years ago, my husband and I wanted to buy a house. When we looked at Edmonton and the landscape, we saw that we could buy a house in the Alberta Avenue district. That district was an old, historical neighbourhood. Though it was widely seen to have a lot of crime and grime, I was a theatre artist and it was affordable for us, so we thought: Let's do it. We bought the house.

We went for a picnic. We put down our gingham blanket, and there was a fellow who was chasing a woman with a two-by-four across the picnic. We looked and saw needles scattered everywhere. My husband and I asked ourselves, “Is this the place that we need to make a home?”

It was a big question, but as we began to live in the community, we began to bump into local artists in the little neighbourhood pubs and in the little cultural grocery stores, and we began to collect and gather in homes. It was fantastic. We began to ask the question of what the arts can do to build community. This was a neighbourhood that needed a lot of love, and our hope and prayer was that we could edify this community through the arts.

The answer was the Kaleido Family Arts Festival. We closed five blocks of 118 Avenue, which was known as the strip, and we filled the rooftops with artists. Sidewalks, alleyways, storefronts and vacant lots were filled with theatre, dance, music, visual arts, artisans and street performances for three full days, and it transformed the neighbourhood. The neighbours, the newspapers, everyone started talking. Instead of saying “prostitution meets produce” and talking about crime, grime and exploitation, people began to talk about hope, creativity, resilience and what the arts can do—they change people. People see a neighbourhood. They can change themselves, and we change each other.

From there, we began a space, The Carrot Community Arts Coffeehouse, an art social enterprise. Everyone said, “We'll give you six months, Christy, to see if this will work.” We've been there for 19 years, but we are in a critical time right now, because funding is difficult. It is our office. It is our hub. It is our performance space.

We are also looking at building ArtsCommon 118 in the next three years.

Next came Deep Freeze: A Byzantine Winter Festival, a francophone, Ukrainian, Asian and Latino winter festival—all things winter in Edmonton, including heritage, storytelling, music and culture. It was two days in which everything came alive again on 118 Avenue.

The impacts, however, extend far beyond the festivals. Arts and culture reduce isolation, build belonging, support local businesses, animate spaces, cause vacant lots to come to life, strengthen food security and create safer, more connected communities. You all know this. You're the champions who do this, but we need your help to find sustainable ways to do it. Our spaces are in jeopardy.

Arts and cultural programming create those connections. I read a report from the Edmonton Arts Council and found that arts and festivals generate more than $171 million annually in economic activity in Edmonton.

The arts are not simply an expense; they're an investment. Where there is art, there is life. There's connection. There's support, and there's vibrancy. Our little organization is an incredible team of people who not only do art but also help newcomers. The grassroots organization that we work in doesn't just do one thing. We're hybrid, and that's what makes it difficult with Canadian Heritage. We don't fit in a box nicely. When it comes to looking at any kind of specialty work that we need—say, for the practice of accessibility, community and the artist's practice—the definition of professional artist seems to be a hindrance.

Canada's increasing cultural diversity and the arrival of many newcomers has been great in our community. We support them. We help them. We give them a leg-up. We help them write their grants. However, the pot is stretching, and there's no extra funding for those individuals, which makes it really difficult.

We also encourage Canadian Heritage to focus on four actions. The first is defining “professional artist”. The endowment program seems to be a key piece to sustainability.

The second is increasing long-term operational multi-year funding for cultural spaces. That is a piece right now that is really in jeopardy.

The third is taking a renewed look at the infrastructure—what's old, what is new and what is to come for the next generation.

The fourth is building communities through arts and heritage programs. As I said, it's fantastic, but we as an arts organization are helping the younger arts groups try to manage and to walk through those grant programs.

What began as a small grassroots movement in our struggling neighbourhood has become a major force in Edmonton. I'm so proud of our team and our thousands of volunteers, but we can't do this alone. Arts, heritage and culture are not separate from community safety, economic development, mental well-being, belonging or neighbourhood renewal.

We have linked arms with you for two decades, and we are so glad we have. We are so thankful to have this conversation and the many more to come.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

Thank you very much.

Morgan Simms from the Glasgow Square Theatre is next. You now have the floor for five minutes.

Morgan Simms Manager, Program, Culture, and Events, Glasgow Square Theatre

Good morning, Madam Chair and honourable members of the committee.

Thank you for the opportunity to appear today. I have the honour of being the program, culture and events manager for the Town of New Glasgow and Glasgow Square Theatre, a municipally owned venue in a rural community within northern Nova Scotia of just under 10,000 residents.

Our theatre is the only professional arts and cultural space within the town and a central part of our downtown core. I approach this work from the perspective of managing a rural municipal theatre in which cultural programming is a daily balance of artistic value, community access and financial responsibility. Our venue is fully municipally funded by the Town of New Glasgow, with approximately $400,000 in annual support. While modest compared to that for venues of similar capacity, this funding has remained stable despite increased financial pressure. For 2026-27, there were no cuts, and over $40,000 has been committed for capital upgrades.

I am grateful for this support, but I recognize the ongoing challenge municipalities face in balancing culture with complex social issues, policing, fire services and other priorities. Cultural funding is increasingly required to demonstrate measurable value despite its broad community impact.

At a local level, a sold-out show extends well beyond our stage. A sold-out show means hotel stays, full restaurants and increased activity for our downtown core. In rural communities, venues like ours are both cultural anchors and economic drivers.

One challenge is access to federal funding. Many programs, including those under the Canada music fund, exclude municipally operated venues from direct operational support. While infrastructure and show-specific funding exist, there is a growing need to include wider federal support for municipal cultural spaces that carry both public service and fiscal responsibility.

We are fortunate to receive regional support through Music Nova Scotia's community presenters program, which helps offset artist guarantees for Nova Scotian artists and strengthens the ability to take performing risks while maintaining access to live performances.

We are also proud members of the Atlantic Presenters Association, a member-based, multidisciplinary arts organization that connects performing arts presenters across Atlantic Canada through shared programs, resources and professional development. The APA is essential in strengthening collaboration across a geographically dispersed region. Without this network, presenters would be far less connected, making it significantly more difficult to share artists' knowledge and opportunities across Atlantic performing landscapes.

Our programming focuses heavily on emerging and local Canadian artists. While these artists may draw strong support in their hometowns, that does not always translate into ticket sales in smaller markets like mine. As presenters, we often take intentional financial risks on culturally important programming that may not fully recoup costs. Wider federal operational support would help reduce this burden and allow greater investment in impactful programming for our community.

A further pressure is the impact of large-scale ticketing platforms and dynamic pricing. As major touring acts become increasingly expensive, many Canadians are forced to choose between one major event and several smaller community performances, typically priced at $20 to $40 at our venue. Once that discretionary spending is used, support for local venues declines, limiting access to emerging artists and straining grassroots spaces.

Despite this, we are seeing growth at Glasgow Square. Through consistent engagement at regional and national industry conferences, we have strengthened relationships with artists and agents alike and positioned ourselves as an active presenter of emerging talent. This has resulted in a year-over-year ticket sales increase for us of approximately $60,000.

However, increased sales do not always translate into profitability, as some shows are intentionally programmed for artistic development rather than commercial return.

To address affordability, we've launched Moments for Everyone with our regional library. It provides people with free access to tickets using their library card, with 15 to 25 tickets redeemed per show, absorbed directly through our operating budget. Many participants tell us that it's the only way they can regularly access live performances within our community.

We're also investing in emerging artists through Songs from the Square, a monthly showcase featuring two Atlantic Canadian artists with guaranteed performance fees. It reduces barriers for artists to get on our stage while offering a pay-what-you-can model for our audiences.

Beyond culture, our venue supports broader community goals, including the attraction and retention of health care workers through Healthy Pictou County, a community-based health recruitment and retention initiative focused on recruiting and supporting health care professionals in Pictou County. We have seen that access to cultural life can influence decisions for these professionals to stay in or relocate to our region.

In closing, Glasgow Square Theatre is the heartbeat of our community. As we mark 25 years, we continue to navigate aging infrastructure and audience development while remaining committed to our mission.

We believe that the value of venues like ours is measured not only in ticket sales but also in cultural and social economic strength. If rural performance spaces disappear, the next generation of Canadian touring artists will lose early-stage discovery platforms and emerging artists will lose essential stages to grow and sustain their careers.

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

Thank you.

Next, we'll go back online to the Society for Arts and Technology.

Jenny Thibault, you have the floor for five minutes.

Jenny Thibault Executive Director, Society for Arts and Technology

Good morning.

I have been the executive director of the Society for Arts and Technology, the SAT, for five years now. This organization is celebrating its 30th anniversary this week.

Since 1996, the SAT has been dedicated to creating, disseminating and researching digital arts and electronic music in the heart of Montreal's Quartier des spectacles, or entertainment district. Over the years, it has become a pioneering site that has inspired many other spaces, both here and abroad.

I am here today because I would like to talk about the fundamental role that cultural spaces play in our society. Before a work exists, before an artist can meet their audience, they first need spaces to let their imaginations flourish, to experiment, to collaborate, to create and to take risks.

Places like the SAT are much more than buildings: They are essential cultural infrastructures. These are places where artists develop their practice, where disciplines meet, where communities come together and where the artistic practices of tomorrow are built.

For close to 30 years, the SAT has supported artists working at the intersection of arts and technology. We manage specialized infrastructure, including an immersive dome, creative research labs, studios and advanced technology equipment, which remains difficult to access elsewhere. These spaces not only support artists, but also contribute to the international profile of Canada and Montreal as hubs for digital creation, immersive experiences and electronic music.

However, these places are facing significant challenges today. Operating costs are rising rapidly. The findings are the same, whether we are talking about dance, theatre, music, circus or digital art: the evolution of costs related to the operation and maintenance of cultural venues far exceeds inflation.

A study conducted by Théâtres associés recently found that average costs related to the management of performing arts venues increased by 53% between 2017 and 2024, while inflation was around 20% over the same period. So there is a major lag, a gap of 33%.

Cultural organizations often have no choice but to prioritize the maintenance of their infrastructure, often at the expense of their mission, which is to support creation and present works. In the case of technological infrastructure, the challenge is even greater. Equipment is aging rapidly, and technologies are constantly evolving.

While programs support the creation of projects, they have a harder time supporting the maintenance, modernization and operation of the infrastructure itself. The result is that, to maintain this infrastructure, we have to reduce our programming, our activities and our artistic support.

Our infrastructure is permanent. It therefore requires long-term support mechanisms, because it becomes extremely difficult to plan for the future when funding remains ad hoc and subject to intense competition.

These issues are particularly important when we talk about the next generation of artists. We provide residences, mentorship, training, specialized equipment and, often, their first opportunities to present their work. The next generation is evolving in a particularly difficult context: growing economic insecurity, limited access to professional spaces, increased challenges related to the development of an artistic career, and so on. Supporting cultural infrastructure means directly supporting current and future artists, as well as our collective ability to innovate and shine.

Lastly, we also need to talk about another issue: the growing concentration of the cultural sector. We are operating in a context where a few major players occupy an increasingly important place. Independent venues and cultural non-profit organizations play a vital role in our ecosystem, as they develop new talent, take artistic risks and ensure cultural diversity. They provide spaces for artists who don't always find their place in more commercial models.

Canada's cultural vitality depends precisely on this balance, on the coexistence of small, medium and large players and on the diversity of voices, models and spaces. Cultural spaces are not expenses; they are key levers. They enable artists to create, communities to come together and Canada to remain a leader in creation and innovation. Supporting these spaces today means investing directly in the next generation of artists and in the cultural vitality of tomorrow.

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

Thank you.

Before giving the floor to the representatives of the Union des artistes, I'm going to suspend the meeting for a few minutes, as we have a witness experiencing technical difficulties. I want to make sure that everything is working well before we continue.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

I call the meeting back to order.

We will now hear from the representatives of the Union des artistes.

Ms. Kontoyanni and Mr. Curzi, you have the floor for a total of five minutes.

Tania Kontoyanni Chair, Union des artistes

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Members of the committee, thank you for having us today as part of this essential study on the state of creative and performance spaces in Canada.

The Union des artistes represents more than 13,000 professional artists in Quebec and Canada, working in the performing arts, audiovisual and sound recording fields. We represent actors, dancers, singers and variety artists, among others. Our mission is to defend their professional, economic and social interests and to protect their working conditions.

The artists we represent perform across all cultural venues in all regions of the country, from the largest venues to the smallest venues. They are therefore directly dependent on the state of these spaces in order to practise their occupation. It is from this perspective, that of the interpreters, that we wish to contribute to your work.

We have carefully read the report recently tabled by Théâtres associés, “Nos scènes fragilisées, nos arts vivants menacés”. This document, co‑signed by 34 Quebec venues, sheds light, with very concrete figures and examples, on a reality we have been seeing for several years on the ground: our cultural infrastructure is crumbling, and this has a direct impact on the working conditions of our artists.

In performance, rehearsal and creative venues, there are problems with heating, outdated technical equipment and inadequate sanitation facilities. In addition, there are issues specific to certain disciplines, such as the quality of floors for dancers, which is essential to preventing injuries. These conditions are not anecdotal; they are widespread and directly affect the health, safety and dignity of artists at work.

Beyond these immediate issues, the report highlights a much broader systemic problem: operating and maintenance costs for venues are rising much faster than revenues and public support. When work becomes urgent, organizations often have no choice but to dip into production budgets to deal with it. This is where the impact on artists becomes particularly concerning.

In concrete terms, this means: shows put on with fewer artistic means; smaller casts, meaning fewer artists at work; lower fees, despite already very real precarity; less rehearsal time; and, as a result, lower contributions to the social safety net, particularly for group insurance and registered retirement savings plans.

Therefore, maintaining buildings gradually erodes conditions for artistic practice conditions, but also the economic security of artists. This is in addition to other pressures that you've also heard about in your work.

At the Scènes de musique alternatives du Québec, which plays a key role in the development of careers and the discoverability of emerging artists, we see chronic underfunding and significant real estate insecurity, since the majority of these venues are rented and therefore exposed to significant rent increases and real estate speculation.

In general, when budgets stagnate, whether in festivals or venues, it is risk-taking that is set aside. It is often the next generation and artistic diversity that suffers first. Added to this is an increasing concentration of the live performance market in the hands of large integrated groups, such as Live Nation, for example, which control both distribution, ticketing, several venues and a growing part of the ecosystem.

Taken together, all these factors create a vicious circle: venues become more expensive to maintain, art budgets are compressed and artists' conditions deteriorate.

However, the public is there. Venues are filling up, festivals are attracting people and tours are working. In short, the appetite for the performing arts is real. The problem is not a lack of vitality in the sector; it's a structural imbalance in the way we fund and support the infrastructure that makes that vitality possible.

In this context, one of the requests made by venues seems essential to us: the establishment of stable and predictable funding for cultural infrastructure.

A fund like that would ensure that the investments needed to maintain, upgrade and modernize spaces are truly dedicated to these needs and not taken from artistic budgets. We are currently seeing that, when infrastructure is not adequately funded, creators and artists are the ones who pay the price. Salaries decline, work opportunities become scarcer and the very foundations of their social safety net are weakened.

The Canadian government has committed to strengthening the social safety net for artists, but in reality, without adequate support for infrastructure, they are still paying the price. We can't claim to be improving their living conditions while undermining them through building maintenance. This paradox must be remedied.

Providing stand-alone support for creative and performance spaces means protecting much more than buildings. It means preserving the integrity of artistic work and the living conditions of the people who are central to our culture. It also means ensuring that works continue to be created, performed and shared with the public and that artists can make a decent living.

Thank you for your attention.

The Chair Liberal Lisa Hepfner

Thank you.

We will now turn to questions from members, starting with Mrs. Thomas for six minutes.

You have the floor.

8:50 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Thank you very much. Thank you to our witnesses for taking the time to be here.

My first question goes to Mr. Filsinger of Iron Fox Games.

You seem to be a really great Canadian success story. Congratulations.

8:55 a.m.

Chief Executive Officer, Iron Fox Games

Ryan Filsinger

Thank you very much.

8:55 a.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

I was doing a bit of research, and you had an interview in which you talked about your first year of business. You made just over $2 million in revenue. I would imagine that several years later, it has only grown. Can you talk a little about your success as a company and what your current revenue streams are?