Evidence of meeting #114 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was see.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
I would like a recorded vote, please.
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 6; nays 3 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Liberal
Liberal
Churence Rogers Liberal Bonavista—Burin—Trinity, NL
This one in particular supports the commitment that no project would be sent back to the beginning of the process. Again, it's in line with the other amendments in terms of the transition process.
Liberal
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
Yes, please.
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 5; nays 3 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Deb Schulte
We're on LIB-74, which is Mr. Fisher.
Wait a minute, we're into clause 3. We had one pending thing we were going to go back to, which was a definition. It was NDP-40.1, and it was to add the definition potentially into the beginning of that section.
Linda.
NDP
Linda Duncan NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
If you have it there that would be helpful because I have so much paper here.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Deb Schulte
It was your definition of “adaptive management”, and you were going to stick it in at the beginning of that section. Do we have the page number?
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Deb Schulte
Thank you.
Yes, “adaptive management”, because we added a change.
There was a request to basically go away and understand whether that definition was acceptable. I believe I had unanimous consent if it passes to insert it into this section of the bill.
There was unanimous consent to reserve the chance to do that, and now we have to decide. It's not to do it. It's to vote on whether we're going to do it. It was to give us that opportunity to go back. We reserved the right to go back, which we're doing now, to add the definition. The definition is as brought forward in amendment NDP-40.1.
Is that right, Linda?
NDP
Linda Duncan NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
That's correct.
My understanding, and the opinion I'm given, is that the way the rules were changed for committees, and then going back to the House, if you had an opportunity to bring forward the amendment at committee and chose not to, you could not bring it at report stage.
NDP
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Deb Schulte
We're all good. We're on the page. Everybody has the definition in front of them.
Amendment NDP-40.1 would add that definition on page 38, line 22.
Shall the amendment carry?
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON
I would like a recorded vote.
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 1 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Liberal
Conservative