They are comparable, because they are both contribution programs. One is for non-profit, and the other one was directed to the private sector. We're running the cost-sharing the same way we'd been running the CHPIF program. We have certification officers, service providers, but they are within Parks Canada now; we're not tapping into the expertise of others. We have the statements that are still on the register. You need to be on the register to be eligible for the cost-sharing. Standards or guidelines are still the benchmark that we're using to assess projects.
So in fact they are both working the same way. It's just that it's not targeted to the same audience.