I wouldn't say they are at odds. They're both considered when we're making decisions. In terms of reporting, we're asked to report on anything that we're doing on the ecological front, whereas with the commemorative integrity is something that we do because we want to do it. There's no mandate, with the exception of the act of the agency, that's asking us to report on this. It's something we do. I think we're getting better in the management of both as well.
Also, with the indigenous components, there's a lot we can do on the heritage cultural aspect in our national parks. It's much more than we thought we could to. It's also a new avenue that we're looking at.