Evidence of meeting #37 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Angela Crandall
John Moffet  Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment
Vincent Ngan  Director General, Horizontal Policy, Engagement and Coordination, Department of the Environment

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

I will call this meeting to order. It's nice to see you all again, colleagues.

Before we get right into the clause-by-clause discussion, I just want to mention that we have with us today, Mr. Millar from the Department of Finance; Mr. Moffet from the Department of the Environment; and Mr. Vincent Ngan, director general, horizontal policy, engagement and coordination, Department of the Environment.

Also, I would like to take a moment to mention that you may, as members of this committee, have received an invitation to participate in a meeting on COP26. It's taking place on June 10 between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. GMT.

What does GMT mean? What kind of time is that?

4:35 p.m.

The Clerk of the Committee Ms. Angela Crandall

That's Greenwich Mean Time.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

That's 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. eastern time.

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Chair, I am sorry to interrupt you, but there is no interpretation.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Do you have it now, Madam Pauzé?

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC

No, there is none. Could you say a little something in English so that we can see what's happening?

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

We seem to be having trouble with interpretation. Could somebody give me a thumbs-up?

I see somebody waving a hand.

Are we good now?

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC

We have the interpretation now.

Thank you.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay, great.

I don't know if you heard any of this, Madam Pauzé, but we have with us Mr. Ngan from Environment and Climate Change Canada.

Also, members of the committee may have received an invitation to participate at a meeting on COP26 on June 10 between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. Greenwich Mean Time, which is 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. eastern time. If you wish to participate, please contact the clerk, and she will provide the details for you.

On the good news front, we are able to do a three-hour meeting today. I'm not sure if we can get anything tomorrow, but we do have three hours today. I will break at around six o'clock, maybe a bit before, for 10 minutes. Then we can carry on with the second half of the meeting. The meeting will end at 7:35.

4:35 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Chair, could I just slide in a small request to be sent that invitation for the meeting on COP26?

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

My understanding was that everyone already received it.

Madam Clerk, can you make sure that Ms. May gets the invitation?

4:35 p.m.

The Clerk

Definitely.

(On clause 11)

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

We were at PV-19, which means that, Ms. May, you are up.

4:35 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

This one I'll give a bit of an explanation for. I have so many amendments.

I want to reference for members of the committee the amendment you've already passed that was brought forward by the government. It's amendment G-3, which includes the following: “Each greenhouse gas emissions target must represent a progression beyond the previous one.” My amendment is not only consistent; it buttresses this and frames it properly in the fact that we already have committed in the Paris Agreement to a principle that's called ratcheting up. In other words, any country may replace its nationally determined contribution at any time, but only to ratchet up.

I'm hoping that Raj Saini will see the benefit of making sure that we amend clause 11. We would add, “that is consistent with the purpose of this Act and with the commitment to ratchet up targets” within the meaning of “the Paris Agreement, done in Paris on December 12, 2015.” Again, it's just placing in the proper context how much we are already committed to, and in some additional amendments to Bill C-12, we reiterate commitments that we have made to only ratchet up.

I hope that this amendment will meet with your approval.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

We have Madam Pauzé and Mr. Albas.

Ms. Pauzé, the floor is yours.

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I would like to lend my support to the amendment made by the member from the Green Party. In fact, amendment G-3, which was passed, also mentioned ratcheting up the targets. So I imagine that everyone will support amendment PV-19.

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Mr. Albas.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

Mr. Chair, I would like to ask the officials two questions.

One is certainly in regard to PV-19. The language that PV-19 entertains is the word “ratchet”. Is there anything in the definitions section? MP May had mentioned the progression element, that it was added in previously. Could you just explain, first of all, if there is any legal text within Bill C-12, under the definitions, for the word “ratchet”? How would that interface with progression?

4:40 p.m.

John Moffet Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

I think I can answer that.

The term isn't used elsewhere in the act, as Ms. May has explained. It's a term that's used in the Paris Agreement, and her amendment references the Paris Agreement. My assumption would be that the term would be interpreted as it is used in the Paris Agreement.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

Is there a legal term [Technical difficulty—Editor] agreement where it defines [Technical difficulty—Editor] understanding of the term?

4:40 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

I think it's just a common understanding that parties are expected to, over time, increase the stringency of their commitments.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

Okay.

My second question is for Mr. Ngan, and I'll be very quick about this.

Horizontal policy.... Is there someone in your department who has vertical policy?

4:40 p.m.

Vincent Ngan Director General, Horizontal Policy, Engagement and Coordination, Department of the Environment

No, we don't.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

It's just an interesting term.

Thanks.

4:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Seeing no further hands, I'll call the vote.

Madam Clerk, would you do a roll-call vote on PV-19.

(Amendment negatived: nays 10; yeas 1)