Evidence of meeting #133 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was target.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jerry V. DeMarco  Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Office of the Auditor General
Kimberley Leach  Principal, Office of the Auditor General
Rinaldo Jeanty  Assistant Deputy Minister, Lands and Minerals Sector, Department of Natural Resources
André Bernier  Director General, Electricity Resources Branch, Department of Natural Resources
Vincent Ngan  Assistant Deputy Minister, Climate Change Branch, Department of the Environment
James McKenzie  Principal, Office of the Auditor General

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Kram Conservative Regina—Wascana, SK

Okay.

6:10 p.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Lands and Minerals Sector, Department of Natural Resources

Rinaldo Jeanty

—and we'd have to go back and verify that in terms of permitting.

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Kram Conservative Regina—Wascana, SK

If you could provide that answer in writing, I would appreciate it.

In your assessment of the critical minerals strategy, did you review how Canada's regulatory approval timelines compare to those of our international competitors?

6:10 p.m.

Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Office of the Auditor General

Jerry V. DeMarco

I don't believe we did a comparison in terms of the timelines for approval, and of course that would change by province and territory, because there is no one timeline for approving a mine in Canada.

As we just heard, the main permitting authorities are provinces and territories. There would be many different timelines depending, on the jurisdiction.

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Kram Conservative Regina—Wascana, SK

Mr. Chair, how am I doing for time?

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

You're pretty much done.

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Kram Conservative Regina—Wascana, SK

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Madame Chatel is next.

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'd like to come back to a point that was made earlier.

My Conservative colleague, Mr. Leslie, said earlier that he was interested in the cost-benefit relationship of certain measures and value for money.

However, the most effective measure, according to many economists and conservatives, is really carbon pricing. Economists talk about it not only in terms of cost versus benefit, but also in terms of intervention.

Mr. DeMarco, you said that, if we don't have carbon pricing to achieve our objectives, we need to make regulations and introduce caps in all sectors. We need to encourage players in the sector to act or invest. We need to explode our deficit and invest in decarbonization projects.

What is your opinion on the cost-benefit relationship in relation to carbon pricing?

6:15 p.m.

Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Office of the Auditor General

Jerry V. DeMarco

I didn't bring our 2022 report on carbon pricing, but I recall that the first few pages provide a summary of the various organizations, including the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, and the World Bank, that have found it to be effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, if implemented in an appropriate manner.

You could go and consult them. In our audit, we found that there were problems, and we made recommendations to improve carbon pricing in Canada.

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

I'd like to come back to what I said about California. I was mistaken. In 2024, it is the world's fourth-largest economy. If California were a country, it would be the fourth largest economy in the world, ahead of Japan.

However, California has implemented a carbon pricing system. When I hear conservatives say that this measure doesn't exist in the United States, I don't know what planet they live on.

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

One moment, there's a point of order.

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

I rise on a point of order, Mr. Chair, since the member is alluding to what I said.

I never said that no state had a carbon tax.

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

Your colleague said that.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

This is not a point of order.

It has been said that the United States has no—

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

We talked about the United States.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

The United States includes California.

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Does this also include Wisconsin?

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

On this point of order, Mr. Chairman, I'm just curious if Mr. Deltell—

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Excuse me for interrupting, Mr. van Koeverden, but there is a point of order.

What's your point of order?

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

My question is if Mr. Deltell would like to clarify if he's referring to Quebec's price on pollution or Canada's price on pollution.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

I think we're going off on a tangent that isn't constructive.

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Finish your question. It will be my pleasure to clarify.

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

I'd like to speak on the point of order.