No, I don't want to remove it, as it was said that it was possible to have both.
We know that in education it is better to repeat more than once if you want people to understand, and this is even truer in politics.
Evidence of meeting #43 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was right.
A video is available from Parliament.
Bloc
Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC
No, I don't want to remove it, as it was said that it was possible to have both.
We know that in education it is better to repeat more than once if you want people to understand, and this is even truer in politics.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Yes, in politics too, you have to repeat often to get the message across.
We will go to the vote.
(Amendment negatived: nays 10; yeas 1)
We go now to G-3.
Who would like to propose G-3?
Mr. Weiler, it's your amendment.
Liberal
Patrick Weiler Liberal West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC
I think we've already dealt with almost a carbon copy of the same one, and I'm not sure at this point if it would even be in order at this time.
Liberal
Liberal
Patrick Weiler Liberal West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC
I'm not going to move it.
Conservative
Liberal
Liberal
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Have a good weekend, everybody. See you next week.
The meeting is adjourned.